Argument For: 'Not An Argument'

So after referencing this stickied topic to a friend, he came up with a few points that I'd like a second opinion on. I came up with a few arguments for what he said, but I'd like to see how you, the readers of SFA, would reply as well.

Here is part of his statement:

This is part of what he said about the post. This is the specific part I'd like to address of his because the rest of what he said was longer and started to seem like unnecessary rambling.
To be perfectly honest, maybe it is because of his excessive babbling, but I became unsure of myself, and I'd like a second opinion.

I know how I may argue against what he said.
My question is: How would you?

 

No the rules are pretty solid. You can't prove something 100%, but the rules make sense.

 

Lets take this into context.

Everything can be misused, money, power, logical arguments, knowledge.

I agree some things probably would be mis used. Posting an example would help, however nothing is perfect; To strive for perfection is to strive for Utopia, nothing wrong with it aside from the fact your striving for the impossible.

The post here is similar to a crash course. While it has its flaws as do everything, its purpose is to educate people on what is, and isn't and argument.