A Theory of Life

You have to accept my premise in order to my statement to be logical.

If you don't accept it, then everything I said was false.

 

Right, and I don't. But even if I were to accept the premise "Life, by definition, can be defined as a period of existence with reference to a specific thing", I still don't see how you come to the conclusion that life doesn't exist. Even accepting that definition of life, there is no logical path from life having no purpose, to live not existing.

Unless you claim all of the above to also be a part of your premise, in which case you have no reasoned argument but rather just a bunch of unsubstantiated claims.

 

I can't argue with you.

You simply do not understand my reason.

Not even the brightest light can shine through a closed door.

 

It makes no sense... There is nothing to understand...

 

There is no time in the world. For us there is time. For the universe there isn't. I think there is no beginning to life and there is no end. Life will always be.

 

time is relative. a measurement made up to prove something based on a central form of logic. a way to prove a difference.

 

Thank you -_- I was done responding to this thread but I'm glad to see that somebody else realizes that.

 

I agree with everything up until the last sentence.

No beginning and no end means that something never was nor will be.

For something to always have been with no explaination doesn't make sense.

Wow. That was a really well thought out argument.

----

Check this out.

http://www.roangelo.net/logwitt/logwit12.html

If you thought I made "no logical sense," your mind will be broken after reading the 2nd paragraph of this.