Evidence of Bans.

My brother recently recieved a very unfair ban; we PRESUME for telling a story in off topic about hacking a friend a few years ago (Alexi). This is currently being disputed. All reason was given was "Hacking" yet; we both know for a fact; he is a legit trader; and has 100% feedback.

But that's not important.

The majority of the time; when banned, people have no idea what they have done as it's so vague.

I'm suggesting that when/if banned; a more proven approach is taken, and that a link to the evidence; or atleast a more in depth reason should be given rather than just a one word stamp in the ban description; making it fairer to the banned user if they should wish to dispute; this way they know what they have done; and would also make it easier for the judge and jury to make a more suitable final decision in appeals; as the information is next to the explanation.

Please note: I am in NO way supportive of scammers/hackers/evaders etc. But for those UNFAIRLY banned, this could help cases and speed things up expodentially in final appeal decisions.

Thanks for reading; and all comments are welcome.​

 

Its called the dispute forum. Thanks