AleZ
Member
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2011
- Sythe Gold
- 0
- Messages
- 89
*Better than guides telling you to multiply your last bet by 2.
*Works assuming you aren't scammed
*Gambling is risky and if you don't have any control you will lose all of your money.
Well, most people simply suggest to multiply your last bet by 2 and eventually you will win. Anyway there is an obvious flaw to this theory in that you will only win 1m in the scenario bellow.
Alright, so say you have 100m with you that you want to gamble with. Now, both scenarios of both methods are 5 bets and possible outcomes. Also, they will be based off of a 50/50 chance at 2x your money.
bet amount / total loss if lost / total money received if won
you bet 1m / 1m / 2m
you bet 2m / 3m / 4m
you bet 4m / 7m / 8m
you bet 8m / 15m / 16m
you bet 16m / 31m / 32m
So let's look at this, you can will only win 1m if you use this method without winning more than twice in a row.
If you want a real approach to this, take the following into consideration. Exponential growth. The bet is based off of how much you have bet in TOTAL multiplied by 1.5. All of the following will also be rounded to the nearest 100k after calculation. We'll be using the same syntax (x/x/x).
100m total -
1m / 1m / 2m
1.5m / 2.5m / 3m
3.8m / 6.3m / 7.6m
9.4m / 15.7 / 18.8m
23.4m / 39.1m / 46.8
Now let's look at this situation again. You risk 64.6m (if you lose EVERY GAME) and your total potential earnings are 78.2m (if you win EVERY GAME). Unlike the other method you can win 13.6m unless you win more than twice in a row or lose every game.
EDIT:
Oh and this only works if you have a sufficient capital.
*Works assuming you aren't scammed
*Gambling is risky and if you don't have any control you will lose all of your money.
Well, most people simply suggest to multiply your last bet by 2 and eventually you will win. Anyway there is an obvious flaw to this theory in that you will only win 1m in the scenario bellow.
Alright, so say you have 100m with you that you want to gamble with. Now, both scenarios of both methods are 5 bets and possible outcomes. Also, they will be based off of a 50/50 chance at 2x your money.
bet amount / total loss if lost / total money received if won
you bet 1m / 1m / 2m
you bet 2m / 3m / 4m
you bet 4m / 7m / 8m
you bet 8m / 15m / 16m
you bet 16m / 31m / 32m
So let's look at this, you can will only win 1m if you use this method without winning more than twice in a row.
If you want a real approach to this, take the following into consideration. Exponential growth. The bet is based off of how much you have bet in TOTAL multiplied by 1.5. All of the following will also be rounded to the nearest 100k after calculation. We'll be using the same syntax (x/x/x).
100m total -
1m / 1m / 2m
1.5m / 2.5m / 3m
3.8m / 6.3m / 7.6m
9.4m / 15.7 / 18.8m
23.4m / 39.1m / 46.8
Now let's look at this situation again. You risk 64.6m (if you lose EVERY GAME) and your total potential earnings are 78.2m (if you win EVERY GAME). Unlike the other method you can win 13.6m unless you win more than twice in a row or lose every game.
EDIT:
Oh and this only works if you have a sufficient capital.







