Human Cloning.

[Necromancer24]

Should scientifically born humans be allowed in this world despite of the problems that might arise? Endless debates have surged as this have concerned many people. Human knowledge is endless and should be stopped unless it’s harming others. Human cloning research and experiments both should be allowed as it helps expand human knowledge more, rather than restrict it preventing development and it allows people know more about the human body and its development and functions?

 

[Try and run]

Should scientifically born humans be allowed in this world despite of the problems that might arise? Endless debates have surged as this have concerned many people. Human knowledge is endless and should be stopped unless it’s harming others. Human cloning research and experiments both should be allowed as it helps expand human knowledge more, rather than restrict it preventing development and it allows people know more about the human body and its development and functions?

I wouldn't say that human knowledge is endless, there are still several things we will never know (probably). Sure cloning has it's risks, but thats a part of life, taking risks. I really don't see the problems that could arise, they would be everyday people like you and me (ironically because they're clones of you and me). Still, cloning has many advantages such as cloning vital organs (heart, liver, pancreas, etc). It shouldn't be restricted, the government allowed testing for the atomic bomb, which killed thousands of people, so why shouldn't cloning be allowed? It certainly won't affect society as much as the atomic bomb did. Like the bomb, we just need to keep at it until we get it right. By the way, since you're a grammar nazi, I feel the need to point out a spelling error. I underlined it, you need to rephrase your sentence.

 

[tiger9110]

Should scientifically born humans be allowed in this world despite of the problems that might arise?

This really depends on what problems arise from this, two things that come right into my head are.

1. Clones used as slaves/used for harvesting organs.
2. Clones used for war.

Creating life would go against nature and could go wrong at any second.

Human knowledge is endless and should be stopped unless it’s harming others.

I do believe you mean stopped if it is harming people. However the first statement is not true, there are innumerable things that we do not know, so how could that make human knowledge endless? I wont get into that because that isn't really related to the subject at hand.

Human cloning research and experiments both should be allowed as it helps expand human knowledge more, rather than restrict it preventing development and it allows people know more about the human body and its development and functions?

You speak as though creating these clones will not have a mind of their own and will willingly let themselves be cut up and examined purely for sciences that are experimental rather than useful.
What would clones do to help people know about the human body? Again it would be inhuman to give this "clone" an incurable/unknown sickness' and see how long it can survive for. This is was just what Adolf Hitler did to the Jews.

 

[tofurocks]

I think that we should if it progresses Science and is not used to harm others.

 

[Bud Is King]

I don't think it should ever be allowed. I mean, criminals could 'clone' another criminal, meaning that there'd be more than one, therefore harder to catch. Plus, once one had been caught, the case would be discontinued, when actually the real/cloned criminal(s) would still be out there.

 

[Brendan]

At one stage, I was completely against Human Cloning.

I have a Christian background, and I believe only God has the right too create, Which i guess effectively includes "cloning" Life.

However, I started meddling with the thoughts that, if there were clones, they have body parts, such as organs, Skin, Blood, etc. Could they not be donated?

 

[distracted]

At one stage, I was completely against Human Cloning.

I have a Christian background, and I believe only God has the right too create, Which i guess effectively includes "cloning" Life.

However, I started meddling with the thoughts that, if there were clones, they have body parts, such as organs, Skin, Blood, etc. Could they not be donated?

But once the cloning is done, clones become ACTUAL people. Wouldn't it be immoral to create a person just too take his/her body parts?

 

[Try and run]

But once the cloning is done, clones become ACTUAL people. Wouldn't it be immoral to create a person just too take his/her body parts?

Pretty sure they can clone vital organs.

 

[Evan Wears Prada]

The only reason i think cloning should be allowed is to use the clones organs for the actual human if they have a disease or problem. The world is already overpopulated, introducing these clones wouldn't help the issue.

 

[Necromancer24]

The only reason i think cloning should be allowed is to use the clones organs for the actual human if they have a disease or problem. The world is already overpopulated, introducing these clones wouldn't help the issue.

Use the clone's organs? They might not want to give it to you. Isn't taking away organs against their will a violation of their rights?

 

[AmF]

Should scientifically born humans be allowed in this world despite of the problems that might arise? Endless debates have surged as this have concerned many people. Human knowledge is endless and should be stopped unless it’s harming others. Human cloning research and experiments both should be allowed as it helps expand human knowledge more, rather than restrict it preventing development and it allows people know more about the human body and its development and functions?

What do you mean by scientifically born humans? Many children should have been boy's, but their genes were altered to create a girl, and same thing goes for girls.

If you mean, "an actual clone". It depends whether or not it function's properly, and or if it is normal. (When I mean normal, I don't mean by disfigured, but like, as it is NOT a robot type of child.)

 

[Necromancer24]

What do you mean by scientifically born humans? Many children should have been boy's, but their genes were altered to create a girl, and same thing goes for girls.

If you mean, "an actual clone". It depends whether or not it function's properly, and or if it is normal. (When I mean normal, I don't mean by disfigured, but like, as it is NOT a robot type of child.)

I don't mean the genetically altered people. I mean an actual clone. The functions are perfect. Same as the real person.

Of course, they are normal.

 

[AmF]

I don't mean the genetically altered people. I mean an actual clone. The functions are perfect. Same as the real person.

Of course, they are normal.

Well, do these clones understand what life is, can think for themselves, and know as much as there intended age group?

 

[Necromancer24]

Well, do these clones understand what life is, can think for themselves, and know as much as there intended age group?

Yes of course. They can do everything like a human.

 

[tiger9110]

I don't mean the genetically altered people. I mean an actual clone. The functions are perfect. Same as the real person.

Of course, they are normal.

Yes of course. They can do everything like a human.

Do you realize what you are going on about? If you mean to say that these clones will be exactly like humans, why not reproduce like we have been doing since the human race began.

You also asked us what problems may arise from this, you ALSO said this was broaden our knowledge of humans.

Use the clone's organs? They might not want to give it to you. Isn't taking away organs against their will a violation of their rights?

Now read what you wrote below.

Human cloning research and experiments both should be allowed as it helps expand human knowledge more, rather than restrict it preventing development and it allows people know more about the human body and its development and functions?

What kind of experiments do you propose would be used on these clones, did you not just say that these clones would have rights? How would they feel about experiments done to them?

If you are going to debate/discuss about an issue like human cloning. Please, don't contradict yourself.

 

[Finally_Found_Freedom]

I wouldn't say that human knowledge is endless, there are still several things we will never know (probably). Sure cloning has it's risks, but thats a part of life, taking risks. I really don't see the problems that could arise, they would be everyday people like you and me (ironically because they're clones of you and me). Still, cloning has many advantages such as cloning vital organs (heart, liver, pancreas, etc). It shouldn't be restricted, the government allowed testing for the atomic bomb, which killed thousands of people, so why shouldn't cloning be allowed? It certainly won't affect society as much as the atomic bomb did. Like the bomb, we just need to keep at it until we get it right. By the way, since you're a grammar nazi, I feel the need to point out a spelling error. I underlined it, you need to rephrase your sentence.

That's not a spelling error. Nice try, though.

 

[Throne]

Hitler was obsessed with twins because he thought he could clone them for war, so if we start, (or try) cloning people, they would probably just be used for soldiers anyway?

 

[Arya]

The concept of stopping the gain of knowledge at the expense of harming an inexpensive human is hardly something worth going by.

I personally don't believe that it is wrong to clone a human.

It is, essentially, asexual reproduction. Such would not have even been in existence without the knowledge of fate, so naturally, if the knowledge of fate gives us the insight into asexually reproducing a sexually reproduced creature, then by all means.

Besides, cloning would barely raise problems, depending on those in charge of it. Cloning would actually erase many problems the world has. It would be easier to control the population, among other things.

 

[Try and run]

That's not a spelling error. Nice try, though.

What crawled up your ass? Seriously, every time I see you comment you seem pissed off. I suggest you read the sentence again, it should be "shouldn't" instead of "should". It's completely out of place in the sentence.