W
wombakage
Guest
Ethical?
Technically we have politically imperialized Iraq, and Afghanistan.
/Discuss
Technically we have politically imperialized Iraq, and Afghanistan.
/Discuss
America imperialised the whole Middle East ages ago. American companies have had control of the majority of oil reserves there for a long time. Imperialism isn't just about armies and invasions.
You could also argue that America uses cultural imperialism across the globe. Many countries' traditional beliefs and practices are being eroded by the American system. This is all in the name of increased profits for American companies of course.
That being said, I don't think it's unethical. It's just the way capitalism works.
Imperialism is three parts
Economic, Political, Military
All three
It's unethical
It's racist
lolno. Imperialism in the 18th century may have involved all three. Modern imperialism works differently.
Also, why start a thread if you're just going to say in the second post that it's unethical and racist with absolutely no justification
lolno. Imperialism in the 18th century may have involved all three. Modern imperialism works differently.
Also, why start a thread if you're just going to say in the second post that it's unethical and racist with absolutely no justification
We assume that the Iraqi government is incapable of taking care of themselves. Kinda racist. So we take the burden of improving their society upon ourselves. Read the white man's burden that get back to me.
We assume that the Iraqi government is incapable of taking care of themselves. Kinda racist. So we take the burden of improving their society upon ourselves. Read the white man's burden that get back to me.
Who claimed that the Iraqis belong to an inferior race? Find out what racism means before you throw it everywhere.We assume that the Iraqi government is incapable of taking care of themselves. Kinda racist. So we take the burden of improving their society upon ourselves. Read the white man's burden that get back to me.
they have proven they are incapable of taking care of there selfs time and time again.
This is racism. or social darwinism, or classism, or elitism. DOESNT MATTERthey have proven they are incapable of taking care of there selfs time and time again.
Who claimed that the Iraqis belong to an inferior race? Find out what racism means before you throw it everywhere.
Do you think America really wants to improve their society? Is that what you think the war was about?
Most of your posts involve you quoting some article or theory that you have completely misunderstood, then sending me abusive pms when you realise it.
they have proven they are incapable of taking care of there selfs time and time again.
To your standards, perhaps. Using Soviet Russia as an example, Russians revere strong, authoritarian leaders. Stalin is the third most popular Russian leader in history, and, in Russia today, there is still a very strong authoritiarian vibe. In Western culture, this is highly undesirable, but Russians perceive it differently. This demonstrates that people individually have different standards of what is desirable and what ''taking care of themselves'' constitutes.

