Dispute Follows the Sticky

User: Sei Italiano
Infracted for: Spamming
Why unjust: Unreasonable
Links? : yes


The point is that

-Your supposed to look at all the reasons on why it is acceptable not the >>1<< reason it isnt
-Bumping my thread... wheres the sticky that says spamming
-Dont you think the guy who needs 99 fishing SHOULDVE BEEN SPECIFIC ON ME TO STOP POSTING, I posted when i got a couple new vouches
-Marajuana thread, I posted NO!!! when i meant it is BAD!!! i can edit it jesus christ

I DONT LIKE BEING BANNED FOR A MONTH BY THE SAME MOD FOR MOST OF THE INFRACTIONS


-----------------------------------------

I did not spam if you think about it

I DONT KNOW WHAT THE OTHER INFRACTION IS ALL I REMEMBER DOING IS BUMPING MY THREAD AFTER ANOTHER DAY JESUS AM I NOT ALLOWED TO BUMP AND JUST LET IT DIE?

this one when i said NO i meant i dont think weed is good but shouldve put BAD!! but you see i didnt spam i replied to a topic normally

http://sythe.org/showthread.php?p=4485710#post4485710

This one i bumped my thread A DAY AFTER it was posted on last

http://sythe.org/showthread.php?p=4463724#post4463724

This one the owner of the thread WAS NOT SPECIFIC ENOUGH ON HIS REQUIREMENTS and i posted when i got a few new vouches or was able to provide better service than the others

http://sythe.org/showthread.php?p=4474953#post4474953

 

You haven't followed the structure at all. This post is virtually, physically and paradoxically a labyrinth.

Also, the infraction was deserved. Denied.