JESSE said:
Just ask a link to their profile.. You don't need to see who's banned; just who's not. It's not the fact that it's too much work to post something like that, it's unnecessary. You can just get a link to the persons profile, look at their vouches, maybe even use an MM.
The high profile scammers are being sought out so they don't get away with thousands again. They can't think it's ok to scam behind a computer and feel safe about it.
Yes but there is still the problem that I can't differentiate between those who got banned for spamming etc, and stealing or worse. And in my short time here, I've learnt that vouchs mean almost nothing. Also brings up one of my original points, what if I had them added on MSN, didn't know they were banned and decided to make a trade with them, or I knew they were banned, and though maybe I could still somewhat trust them. Maybe not me personally, but what about our younger users? I know we don't all need the safety blanket, but it's always good to have it?
verts said:
You joined in Feb 09... I wouldn't really start claiming yourself as a 'loyal' member >_O
This whole thread is way OTT. Your suggestion got denied: let that be the end of it.
First off, I mentioned above I was new, so you don't have to spam my damn thread repeating me like a 2$ parrot.. Next time you decide to spam one of my threads with ignorant BS to get your post count up, go take a long walk.. Off a 500-foot building first.
I never mentioned myself as a Loyal User here, yes I am new. But I'm also old enough to call shit properly when I see it. I'm voicing an opinion, and if I'm correct I have the right to do so in this section. I was speaking for the safety of everyone here, not just myself. Not everyone here just thinks of themselves verts.
So again, next time you post in one of my threads, try to at least compete with my 15 month-old daughter..
Thank you JESSE, but still looking for some other opinions/explanations from our higher-ups?
When I speak, I don't speak for nothing, I believe in what I'm saying. So I guess I'm just looking for some validation/logic here?
