Adblock breaks this site

resolved

Discussion in 'Report A Scammer Archive' started by BufferOverNo, Dec 13, 2022.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BufferOverNo

    BufferOverNo Kotlin Wizard | Web Dev Wizard

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2020
    Posts:
    87
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    191
    resolved

    Scammer's profile link: https://www.sythe.org/members/peng.1538860/
    Amount scammed: 215m + In services + lvl 108 1802 total, infernal cape, avernic defender, 63m bank
    Discord ID + Unique Discord ID: BENG#0001 268384780264013825
    Proof that it's their Discord: Screenshot https://www.sythe.org/threads/peng-...ty-skilling-questing-infernals-and-much-more/
    Explanation of the trade: Bought services, account got banned during services, spent 215m last couple of days with these guys and then get a perma ban for botting today whilst they were doing me 44-68 farming, accused me of being the reason because during services I helped get mining up.
    How they scammed: Worker botted on my account and got it perma banned, never even had a bot ban on this acc..
    Other relevant trade screenshots:

    Screenshot

    Screenshot
     
    Beatz likes this.
  2. PENG

    PENG ""Runestake.com - Social casino""
    PENG Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2022
    Posts:
    46,613
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    51,490
    Vouch Thread:
    Click Here
    Discord Unique ID:
    1217423973223104522
    Discord Username:
    penggp
    Heidy (3) Lawrence (3) Extreme Homosex (2) Homosex (3) Gohan has AIDS (3) Potamus (4)
    resolved

    BufferOverNo did 3 services in a row. We managed to complete 2, the third service his account got banned on. One of the things he requested was 60-68 mining which he end up doing himself to speed up the process when the worker was offline (he could be doing this by bot or ghostmouse himself, he broke our TOS by logging in / training himself while we ask him not to during a service).

    We never scammed anyone, I even refunded your last service fully (56M) while my TOS is saying you're getting refunded for the part which isn't completed.

    Besides that, botting was not proven nor do my workers have access or knowledge how to do this. The ban reason ''macroing'' has gotten a wide term the past weeks as even RWTing gets banned under this reason. BufferOverNo has become frustrated as he expected more than only the service refunded while I clearly state that obtaining a service is fully on your own risk. He has spend a total of 106,2M and I kindly ask any customer to move any unnecessary wealth off the account which he also didn't do.

    If any sythe mod wants the whole transcript, I've got nothing to hide. Besides that, my TOS and rules are clear enough. I've no idea how this guy gets himself the word ''scammed'' in his mouth but all good.
     
    Wellness, Ahmadht1122 and Red Fox like this.
  3. BufferOverNo

    BufferOverNo Kotlin Wizard | Web Dev Wizard

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2020
    Posts:
    87
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    191
    resolved

    Are you serious? I done it by ghosttmouse or a bot? Your workers used the bot mate, furthermore your workers did not have any issue with me logging in to speed up the service.

    How would I prove your workers were botting? Do I have access to their computers? No.

    You offer services "by hand" which are not by hand, thus scamming members of this community.
     
  4. Yoshiki

    Yoshiki Runestake.com - Slots & Original Games

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2016
    Posts:
    17,093
    Referrals:
    3
    Sythe Gold:
    30,006
    Vouch Thread:
    Click Here
    Discord Unique ID:
    730466048574357565
    Discord Username:
    yoloshiki
    Typhlosion Umbreon Milotic Lairon Politoed Chansey Le Wubba Lubba Dub Dub Why is there BACON in the SOAP!? Detective
    The Mortyest Morty Wait, do you not have an Archer rank? Not sure if srs or just newfag... TOKI! AM'S YOU WEARINGS MY PANTS? Christmas 2024 Two Factor Authentication User Staff of the Quarter Winner
    resolved

    With both the owner of the account and the worker actively working on the account at the same time, it is nearly impossible to prove who was using a bot on the account. Therefore we cannot hold Peng liable for the account being banned for botting.
     
    Semp likes this.
< qemo | invalid >
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.


 
 
Adblock breaks this site