Anyone good at Calculus ?

Discussion in 'Archives' started by Phatmat, Feb 9, 2008.

Anyone good at Calculus ?
  1. Unread #1 - Feb 9, 2008 at 5:31 AM
  2. Phatmat
    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2007
    Posts:
    821
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Phatmat Apprentice
    $5 USD Donor

    Anyone good at Calculus ?

  3. Unread #2 - Feb 9, 2008 at 6:18 AM
  4. Macroman
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2007
    Posts:
    6,919
    Referrals:
    9
    Sythe Gold:
    12

    Macroman Hero
    Do Not Trade

    Anyone good at Calculus ?

    I cant see any questions. and ur siggy is distracting me.
     
  5. Unread #3 - Feb 9, 2008 at 9:33 AM
  6. Phatmat
    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2007
    Posts:
    821
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Phatmat Apprentice
    $5 USD Donor

    Anyone good at Calculus ?

    The questions show up for me, I don't see why they wouldn't work. I will try to post up the links to the pictures.

    Lol about the sig :p.

    - Phatmat.
     
  7. Unread #4 - Feb 9, 2008 at 1:45 PM
  8. Steph
    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2005
    Posts:
    2,680
    Referrals:
    6
    Sythe Gold:
    5

    Steph Azn Goddess / Ex-Admin
    Highly Respected Retired Administrator

    Anyone good at Calculus ?

    I don't have any time this weekend, but if no one else does them I will try to do them next week.
     
  9. Unread #5 - Feb 9, 2008 at 1:54 PM
  10. verryberry10
    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2007
    Posts:
    158
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    5

    verryberry10 Active Member

    Anyone good at Calculus ?

    ironically, i have no idea what that says.


    my kind of math is more like 2+4 =p
     
  11. Unread #6 - Feb 9, 2008 at 2:04 PM
  12. Cymru
    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    Posts:
    693
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Cymru Apprentice
    Banned

    Anyone good at Calculus ?

    I don't think anyone could answer on Sythe. Try asking at yahoo answers or something.

    I'm doing calculus next year (maybe) so if you need help then, ask me lol =P
     
  13. Unread #7 - Feb 9, 2008 at 7:11 PM
  14. Phatmat
    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2007
    Posts:
    821
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Phatmat Apprentice
    $5 USD Donor

    Anyone good at Calculus ?

    Thanks Steph. The assignment is due in this Thursday, so if you get a chance to do any it would be good.

    If you don't have the time it should be ok.

    - Phatmat.
     
  15. Unread #8 - Feb 10, 2008 at 2:16 PM
  16. isosceles
    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    Posts:
    455
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    isosceles Forum Addict
    $5 USD Donor

    Anyone good at Calculus ?

    I'm working on a few of them at the moment. I'll edit in some solutions in a little while.

    I started a math help/discussion thread a little while ago. Feel free to ask any more questions there if you need: http://sythe.org/showthread.php?t=369987.

    EDITED IN:
    If you don't understand any of the steps I did, I would be glad to expound on anything. I have been doing calculus for a little while, so I might be skipping some steps that you aren't as familiar with.

    2. (e)
    Code:
       y = (e^x)ln(2x)
    
    Use product rule:
    
    y' = (e^x)' * ln(2x) + (e^x) * (ln(2x))'
    
    = (e^x) * ln(2x) + (e^x) * 1/(2x)*2    <--- use chain rule to find (ln(2x))'
    
    Now just a little factoring and simplifying:
    
    = (e^x)(ln(2x) + 1/x)  done.

    3. (a)
    Code:
     Ok, we are trying to prove this: d/dx [f(x)]^-1 =  -f'(x)/[f(x)]^2.
    
    If we simply do the derivative on the left side of the equation, we will get the stuff on the right.
    
    d/dx [f(x)]^-1 = -[f(x)]^-2 [b] * f'(x)[/b] <--- using chain rule
    
    Now just simplify:
    
    =  -f'(x)/[f(x)]^2. <-- this is what we were trying to get.
    3. (b)
    Code:
     f(x) * [g(x)]^-1
    
    Use product rule:
    
    f'(x) * [g(x)]^-1 + f(x) * ([g(x)]^-1)'
    
    Now we need to find: ([g(x)]^-1)'. Hey, look! We did that in the previous part of the question. So, I think I'll just put it in instead of doing it again.
    
    = f'(x) * [g(x)]^-1 + f(x) * -g'(x)/[g(x)]^2
    
    and simplify:
    
    = ( f'(x) / g(x) ) - (f(x)*g'(x)) / [g(x)]^2
    
    This is indeed the answer although it is not in the same form as the quotient rule is usually written. To get that form,  multiply  ( f'(x) / g(x) ) by g(x)/g(x). We can do this since g(x)/g(x) is simply equal to 1.
    
    = (f'(x) * g(x)) / [g(x)]^2 - (f(x)*g'(x)) / [g(x)]^2
    
    Now both parts of this have the same denominator. So, subtract:
    
    [IMG]http://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~kouba/CalcOneDIRECTORY/quotientruledirectory/img2.gif[/IMG]
    
    I realize the notation is hard to read... Tell me if any part doesn't make sense.

    Anyway, I really don't feel like doing the others at the moment. Why don't you try them, and if any of them don't make sense, come back and ask. Good luck!
     
  17. Unread #9 - Feb 10, 2008 at 5:35 PM
  18. ImAFool
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2006
    Posts:
    1,497
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    5

    ImAFool Guru

    Anyone good at Calculus ?

  19. Unread #10 - Feb 11, 2008 at 6:05 AM
  20. Phatmat
    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2007
    Posts:
    821
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Phatmat Apprentice
    $5 USD Donor

    Anyone good at Calculus ?

    Thanks greatly isosceles, if there was a +rep system I would have given you a lot.

    I am just reading 3. (b) now, and trying to interpret the notation, but I can understand your steps. Thanks.

    - Phatmat.
     
< || Vapour || NewMember || | Need Some Training Done >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest


 
 
Adblock breaks this site