At the people saying doubling your loss is a bad choice... Learn some basic maths! If you start from low amounts (1m) you can always use this tactic if you've got as much gp as you told. Maxed against maxed boxing is always 50/50, only dependant on luck, nothing else, assuming no movement is on and you know how to hit right after the 321 countdown (except occasionally lag). Why do you think that betting on red in roulette for more than 3 times in a row is forbidden in casinos?
The chance of loosing;
2 times in a row : 25%
3 times in a row : 12.5%
4 times in a row : 6.25%
5 times in a row : 3.125%
If you really happen to loose 5 times in a row, then you're just horribly unlucky and not suited for staking at all.
You're an idiot. Don't say shit like that if you have no idea what you're talking about. With this method you ALWAYS end up going bankrupt in the end.At the people saying doubling your loss is a bad choice... Learn some basic maths! If you start from low amounts (1m) you can always use this tactic if you've got as much gp as you told. Maxed against maxed boxing is always 50/50, only dependant on luck, nothing else, assuming no movement is on and you know how to hit right after the 321 countdown (except occasionally lag). Why do you think that betting on red in roulette for more than 3 times in a row is forbidden in casinos?
The chance of loosing;
2 times in a row : 25%
3 times in a row : 12.5%
4 times in a row : 6.25%
5 times in a row : 3.125%
If you really happen to loose 5 times in a row, then you're just horribly unlucky and not suited for staking at all.
You're an idiot. Don't say shit like that if you have no idea what you're talking about. With this method you ALWAYS end up going bankrupt in the end.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marting...ability_theory)
I used the doubling method to get up to 900m and then lost 8 times in a row and got cleaned. Here's a rough example of what will happen if you use this method -
Say you're staking 2m at a time and have 250m. If you double each time you lose, you'll go bankrupt if you lose 7 times in a row. There's a 1/128, or .78% chance of losing 7 in a row. If you want to double your money, to 500m, you'd have to win 2m 125 times, and since you only have to lose 7 times in a row *once* to lose everything, there's a
125/128 (97%) chance you'll go bankrupt on the way. So if you wanted to double your money, you'd be much better off just staking 250m once, where there's only a 50% chance of going bankrupt.
Thats distorting the numbers.You're an idiot. Don't say shit like that if you have no idea what you're talking about. With this method you ALWAYS end up going bankrupt in the end.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marting...ability_theory)
I used the doubling method to get up to 900m and then lost 8 times in a row and got cleaned. Here's a rough example of what will happen if you use this method -
Say you're staking 2m at a time and have 250m. If you double each time you lose, you'll go bankrupt if you lose 7 times in a row. There's a 1/128, or .78% chance of losing 7 in a row. If you want to double your money, to 500m, you'd have to win 2m 125 times, and since you only have to lose 7 times in a row *once* to lose everything, there's a
125/128 (97%) chance you'll go bankrupt on the way. So if you wanted to double your money, you'd be much better off just staking 250m once, where there's only a 50% chance of going bankrupt.
Thats distorting the numbers.
Toss coins for the rest of your life.
Tell me when you toss 125 heads or tails out of 128 tosses.
Theory =/= practicality
You just answered your own question, re read the whole thing and take it into context.Where does he say anything that suggests tossing 125 of the same out of 128 coin flips. He just said you have about a 125/128 chance of going bankrupt with the doubling method.
Dueling isn't really 50/50, but as I said toss a coin 128 times, and tell me how many lots of 128 do you have to toss before you get ONLY 3 heads or 3 tails out of the 128.Can you explain exactly how this theory will vary from "practicality" in your mind (assuming each duel is 50-50).
As I said dueling isn't 50%, also people don't follow the method precisely.Oh and by the way, I just cleaned someone for 255m who was trying this method.

