$25,000 USD being held by Chicks + breaking no kyc agreement

Scammer's profile link: Chicks
Amount scammed: 100 solana ($25,000 USD at time, important because was taking stable)
Discord ID + Unique Discord ID:
maferquer 944424380723773511
sally093514 652621221380358149
cutecindy 757862220695601152
zolamyie 474317490218860544
Proof that it's their Discord: all gifs below show there unique id being copied.

Explanation of the trade: We agreed to conduct a NON-KYC swap of 100 solana into eth stable currency. I sent over the funds no problem and they got the funds as well. And i was going to receive my stable currency afterwards

How they scammed:
I am not sure if this is correct place to report, but I do some digging and see Chicks have account here on this forum. They also do sales for video games. My friend from crypto scene told me about them, and I find them somewhere else. I think I should make report here.

So, after money go to their Solana address, they make very stupid decision to swap my funds through Binance. Then Binance freeze money because they think something wrong with funds. They tell me I must wait for them to fix problem before I can get my money back. At first, I think, okay, maybe just small technical problem, they will fix themselves because they are ones who decide to use Binance, not me.

Then they start asking me questions about how I get these funds, saying funds are “flagged.” I explain to them, I get all money from customers, it’s not like I make crypto from air, I take it as form of payment. They say maybe one customer I deal with have “bad money.” First, how I am supposed to know this? Second, why they ask me for this information on non KYC trade? Still, they make me give screenshots of private trades with customers, which feel like too much.

After all this, they tell me I must wait for their account to unfreeze before they can send my funds. I am tired of this nonsense and demand my money, but they say only, “Wait patiently,” and tell me I can talk to legal team if I have more questions. Why I must wait for their account to unfreeze when this is 100% their fault? How I could know this would happen? My funds were totally fine when I send, if they frozen on my end, I couldn’t send them in first place.

I write this to push them to give my money faster. I should not wait 2-3 weeks because of problem they make by using Binance. And more bad, they say their whole account is frozen and they cannot do swaps for anyone now. But they lie to me, someone send me screenshot where they ask for swap, and Chicks accept right away, say they can do it no problem. What is this?

This whole thing feel very strange. No proof their account is really frozen, maybe whole story is just fake.

Update: I sit on this text for some time. Now they say I must give selfie + ID to “maybe” get my funds back. Seriously, what the f*ck? These people say they are real company…?


Screen capture - 10b0d2882a6aa60619201bc016552460 - Gyazo - confirming we agree to a no kyc

Screen capture - e910e68ae0754f4e1522d1fa28ecd56f - Gyazo - sending the funds and them acknowldge it and about to send me my swap

Screen capture - 09c656cfbb0b2b0a8e9c1b9620d8a3ec - Gyazo - now requesting for information, due to an issue that has arised within binance, their own binance account , something they have not told me about prior to conducting the trade.

Screen capture - b8f6874c5e36982d666ee1b5c99492db - Gyazo - they confirming they will return funds WHATEVER the scenerio

Screen capture - 2332125b40fd0d04185ca726f2333248 - Gyazo - we cant swap for anyone! we have NO REASON to lie to you! (yea, right..)

Screenshot - c9fd1a5724a1c15b05c799d568e918c5 - Gyazo - a friend sent me this screenshot of them asking to do a trade for them no problem (48 hours after they sent me above message, still ignoring me)

Screen capture - d45b6a8f5a4ad36d5749439a575d8887 - Gyazo - they're now asking for a KYC, ON A NON KYC TRADE?

 

You chose to use a Binance-linked wallet without telling me. If Binance has issues with transactions coming into your account, that’s your problem to manage, not mine.

You assumed the risk by using Binance. I had no control over your choice of wallet or Binance’s rules. If Binance is strict about transactions, that’s something you should have considered before agreeing to the trade. Binance’s policies are not my fault.

They may flag transactions for many reasons, but that doesn’t mean my funds are problematic. It just means they’re enforcing their rules, which you agreed to by using their platform.
[COLOR=oklab(0.89908 -0.00192907 -0.0048306)][/COLOR]

 

i want make specific:

Screen capture - b8f6874c5e36982d666ee1b5c99492db - Gyazo

"WHATEVER the scenario we are returning your money."

i do not know how more clear it need to be, "WHATEVER the scenario", please try to argue this, i beg.

 

I want calrify again. I did NOT agree to using binance. Binance has different rulings toward transacations than the solana network itself. If they had mention a risk of freezing, i would not done this trade. This is standard trading practice everyone knows. NON-KYC exchanges are meant to be done with their own reservoir of funds to prevent issues such as freezing.



I will like to mention once more:

Screen capture - b8f6874c5e36982d666ee1b5c99492db - Gyazo

"WHATEVER the scenario we are returning your money."

so i do not see any defense on there end of things when i was promised my money NO MATTER WHAT.

 

Screen capture - bcf3bdaed91420129bb0e8f36d903ca7 - Gyazo

This is the amount agreed to send me, $25,955 USD in STABLE.

i am posting this in the event Chick decides to only pay back once my payment of choice crashes 50%.

Feel free to remove this if you think this is not valid point to make.

 

I am the legal counsel of ChicksX and would like to clarify the situation regarding this transaction.

ChicksX is a regulated exchange that utilizes various liquidity providers for crypto trades. The choice of liquidity provider is determined by the exchange and does not require customer approval. Additionally, our terms and conditions (Ref:13.1.8) explicitly state that ChicksX is not liable if funds are flagged as stolen or subjected to legal scrutiny.

In this case, Binance, the liquidity provider used for this transaction, flagged the crypto as stolen. As a result, we have been advised to hold the funds while an investigation is conducted. We understand the customer’s frustration, but compliance with such procedures is mandatory.

We are actively working with Binance to resolve this matter and will provide updates as soon as possible. To maintain transparency, I am attaching our correspondence with Binance support.

Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot

 

It seem like Chick does not know what to say, so they speak to lawyer to try finding way to get out of this mess. (why else they view this thread 4 times and not reply? lol)

Those chat log do not seem the same what they told me. Complete different. I think they are showing fake logs.

Screen capture - ee1342a7a79937ebac0e47454b29f06b - Gyazo This is a conversation where they are telling me Binance is saying the complete opposite, so they are lying. Binance literally say 'not my fauilt'. You are framing this to look like it is me who is the scammer. Nice one

if you look as well at my above posts, they say binance is asking for KYC on my end.. This chat log that raman sent does not correspond with what binance were saying before i made this report. How is that possible? Where is the defense on this?



I already show chick the proof my money has came from customers (i should not even have to show, but i did out of fear). I have no responsibility to somehow have known my customer source of fund. I am independent person, not a massive company. This is not normal. Why you think I am use NO KYC? My funds were perfect fine plus NOT frozen, until chick takes it. They got it frozen because they stupid.

As for their rule they have on website, I have reason to suspect they quickly added this policy during this transaction, as i get confirmation from someone while i had this trade issue, that there exists no such policy on their website. Besides, I did not know they even had a website, and i was promised my funds WHATEVER the outcome. This policy rule doesn't apply, even if somehow exists (it doesn't for the circumstance of our trade)

Just because someone say they are legal consul not mean they are saying truth and real, this is manipulation tactic they are trying to get out of this situation. I hope you can see how crazy and scummy this sound.

 

It seem like Chick does not know what to say, so they speak to lawyer to try finding way to get out of this mess. (why else they view this thread 4 times and not reply? lol)

Those chat log do not seem the same what they told me. Complete different. I think they are showing fake logs.

Screen capture - ee1342a7a79937ebac0e47454b29f06b - Gyazo This is a conversation where they are telling me Binance is saying the complete opposite, so they are lying. Binance literally say 'not my fauilt'. You are framing this to look like it is me who is the scammer. Nice one

if you look as well at my above posts, they say binance is asking for KYC on my end.. This chat log that raman sent does not correspond with what binance were saying before i made this report. How is that possible? Where is the defense on this?



I already show chick the proof my money has came from customers (i should not even have to show, but i did out of fear). I have no responsibility to somehow have known my customer source of fund. I am independent person, not a massive company. This is not normal. Why you think I am use NO KYC? My funds were perfect fine plus NOT frozen, until chick takes it. They got it frozen because they stupid.

As for their rule they have on website, I have reason to suspect they quickly added this policy during this transaction, as i get confirmation from someone while i had this trade issue, that there exists no such policy on their website. Besides, I did not know they even had a website, and i was promised my funds WHATEVER the outcome. This policy rule doesn't apply, even if somehow exists (it doesn't for the circumstance of our trade). I will like to mention also on rules of discord (where we perform trade on, 0 mention of website to me) there is no rules stating this. Screenshot - 7ef775136db99257ab3069cbb3236efd - Gyazo

Just because someone say they are legal consul not mean they are saying truth and real, this is manipulation tactic they are trying to get out of this situation. I hope you can see how crazy and scummy this sound.

 

i have direct proof that they updated their Terms of Service after our interaction. I make it a point to read everything carefully, and I distinctly remember that this clause was not present at the time. I believe this is why it took them so long to respond—why their first response came from a lawyer—because they were busy modifying their website and adding this provision retroactively.

I have concrete proof that this update was made recently. If you search for any other term on Google, it appears in indexed results. However, this particular update has not yet been processed by Google’s system, which is why no search results exist for it.

I am not stupid, nice try lawyer and chick. you cannot trick me you shady sketchy people. This show there shady practices. If this is not enough proof, i encourage everybody to look at this

here is video demonstration Watch proofed | Streamable

THIS LINK EXPIRE IN 2 DAY. I SUGGEST EVERYONE DOWNLOAD VIDEO TO HAVE AS PROOF TO PROVIDE. please everyone we need to expose this chick person for their shady business.

 

The fact that the Chicks team had to create a new rule after the report was filed shows they know they messed up. If they had to add this rule out of nowhere, it’s clear they’re in the wrong. What else is there to say? They literally had to make up a new term to cover their mistake.

Chicks, just admit you screwed up and pay me what you owe. You’ve now added this rule to your site, so you won’t make the same mistake again. But that doesn’t change the fact that you need to take responsibility for this. Seriously, own up to your fuck-up and make it right.



i make this with deepseek AI to easier understand my point.

 

To address your inquiry, we did not explicitly agree to a no-KYC trade. It appears to be a misunderstanding on the customer’s part. Our representative, Cindy, only confirmed the trade itself and did not confirm any exemption from KYC requirements. Subsequently, Cindy requested the customer to verify this information. The customer then claimed that Sally, our manager, had approved a no-KYC trade, and Cindy accepted this statement in good faith. However, the customer never directly got this confirmation from Sally. We have to abide by our privacy policy; hence, we cannot share full customer chats here on the public forum. However, we can share the discord chats with the moderators of this forum, where you may find that no such promise was made to the customer. Along with this we can we are sharing customer logs, and Binance logs with the moderators.

Regarding your second question, we confirm that our terms and conditions have not been modified during the time this report took place. The customer’s claim appears to be unsubstantiated and lacks credible evidence

Furthermore, our Binance account has been locked due to issues related to this customer’s crypto. It is reasonable to assume that such complications arise when crypto is flagged as potentially stolen. Binance also referenced a Twitter thread where the relevant SOL address from which funds were sent to us, were primarily associated with a TRUMP phishing website. We can provide all relevant documentation for your review.

Additionally, when Binance requested the customer's details, he provided information belonging to a Venezuelan woman, claiming it was a joint account. This may have further raised Binance’s suspicions, ultimately leading to the account being locked.

 

It looks like Sally deleted the private message she sent me on Discord where she promised NO-KYC. Here’s the thing: for the entire week we talked, I kept saying, "You guys told me NO-KYC," and Sally never once corrected me or said she never agreed to it. If they never promised NO-KYC, why didn’t she say so right away? Instead, they never once corrected me, even mentioned "we're not breaking the no-kyc agreement". Once again, Sally read all of these messages as she was replying in-between. If this was the case, she could've easily argued this and informed her colleague.

Take a second to think about the first paragraph I wrote. How can anyone possibly argue against it? Did Sally suffer some kind of brain damage that made her forget to call me a "liar" for an entire week? Or maybe she has some rare, selective brain damage that allowed her to read and reply to me during multiple conversations about the NO-KYC agreement, but somehow left her completely incapable of saying, "Hey, I never promised that"? Seriously, what kind of mental gymnastics are we dealing with here?

This whole situation is demonstrating how far they will go to lie. First, they added a new privacy policy out of nowhere, trying to make me look like the bad guy. Now, they’re deleting messages and claiming they never promised NO-KYC. As Sythe staff, please think about this: if Sally never agreed to NO-KYC, why didn’t she say so when I brought it up multiple times? This is the second time they’ve done something dishonest, so why are they even being given a chance to defend themselves?

Also, if you ask anyone who knows about caching or indexing to check the video I shared, they’ll confirm the policy was only added recently. This proves my point.

Staff, please don’t fall for these shady tactics. If you do, it’ll be really disappointing. To everyone reading this, just think about how crazy this sounds.

 

Hello Sythe Staff,

I’m genuinely confused as to why you continue to allow them to present more fabricated evidence.

You’ve already given them two opportunities to explain themselves, and both times they’ve provided completely falsified information. Thankfully, I was able to expose their lies regarding the private policy and the deleted messages.

It’s incredibly suspicious that you’re now giving them a third chance to fabricate evidence. Each time, they’re only going to refine their lies, making it harder and harder for me to disprove them. Why are you still allowing this? So far, 99.5% of their claims have been outright lies. Isn’t it logical to assume they’ll just lie again, especially when they’re being given endless opportunities to do so?

This has turned into a never-ending battle where I’m forced to constantly defend myself, even though it’s already blatantly obvious that they agreed to NO-KYC and promised my funds unconditionally.

At this point, it feels like they’ve been handed cheat codes for this report, allowed to say anything without consequence. Mark my words, their next statement will be another fabrication—why wouldn’t it be?

I’m asking you to please put an end to this. Tell them to pay me back. I’m not sure why you’re continuing to let them fabricate evidence, but it’s raising serious concerns.

 

Hello,
am trying to contact you. is there way i can message? Tell Yoshiki on discord to add group chat and then them to leave.

I am unable make account here because using VPN, i do not want get home ip as i am not familiar with who is friend with chick and will give my location to them, they scare me.