200 post requirement for posting in the SFA

[blazinfasstt]

this would cut down enormously the amount of spam and crap that comes into the SFA.

if you look at 99% of the posts made by ppl with under 200 posts in the SFA, they would be spam because most ppl with that few posts do not read the section rules.

i know it says to not suggest this, but the reason given was idiotic, as it doesnt matter if people "trust" others in the SFA.





This would be the first step towards cleaning up the intellectual sewers that we call the SFA.

 

[Piramid]

Agreed, I see so many people with less than 100 posts posting useless comments to get their post count up.

 

[Ingersoll]

From your previous posts I understand that you genuinely care about the SFA section. It would be nice to see the staff members make a requirement, but not as severe as 200 posts. Perhaps cut it down to 100?

 

[blazinfasstt]

From your previous posts I understand that you genuinely care about the SFA section. It would be nice to see the staff members make a requirement, but not as severe as 200 posts. Perhaps cut it down to 100?

trust me, i didnt choose 200 arbitrarily

if you go into the SFA you will see plenty of people with just over 100 posts spamming away.

after 200 it drops off a bit though.



typically, 0-200 post people are still relatively new to sythe and dont read many stickies.

those who arent banned by 200 posts usually understand a little bit better.

 

[tMoon]

- Post count limits/requirements

http://www.sythe.org/suggestions/1445207-do-not-suggest-list-updated-15-july-2012-a.html

Anyway, if you see spam; report it, it'll be dealt with.