Reported Post by Kiro

Wonderland · Apr 29, 2016

Kiro has reported a post.

Reason:

Move to feedback
Click to expand...

Post: A Complaint and Suggestion
Forum: Suggestions
Assigned Moderators: Brendan, Time To Buy, THERSG0D, Cas_M

Posted by: Bus369
Original Content:

http://www.sythe.org/report-scammer-archive/1962518-user-rspspk-staff.html

The bar sythe.org requires for suspected RSPS staff to be banned is far far far to high to be able to be met.

I'd like to point out, I took the time out of my day to hand this high staff to you guys on a silver platter and the report got shot down.

Now, I submitted this evidence via skype to dunworry, he asked me where the picture was and I quote:

going to need proof that the user on your livechat is the user that jailed you

(I submitted a hidden gyazo u guys cant see, it contains the mules name but shows the mule jailed 1 minute after the purchase).

Now, thanks to a few 3rd parties, I was able to trace this staff to a skype.

This skype I reported but this is what dunworry told me:

Dunworry:
the screenie of the convo you showed me seems fair enough, i'd consider that enough for a ban on the grounds of being sketchy. but without any proof that the skype belongs to him, nothing I can do

So What did I do you ask? I provided that proof shown here:

http://prnt.sc/ay3di1

Perfect IP matches to the ip from zopim, what does dunworry say?

zopim proves a trade happened. the skype shows the guy is sketchy. but I'm unable to tie them together, as I cant reproduce the ip from the resolver

He cant "tie this all together" because HE CANT SEEM TO GET THE SAME RESULT, WHEN I PROVIDED A BLOODY PICTURE OF IT!

Now this rsps staff cant be banned, because STAFF cant get a result when I did?

This was his argument:

in this instance, there is an ip with the same picture. considering I cannot re-produce it, and I have no idea where the screenie came from, there isn't enough

Staff shouldn't need to "reproduce" a result if the image is coming from a "semi" valid source, I mean really?

NOW you think that'd be the worst of it right? NOPE.

THE GUY ADMITS TO BEING RELATED TO THE FREAKING RSPS OWNER AND I STILL CANT GET SOMEONE TO ISSUE A BAN!

http://prntscr.com/ayff9j

So after all that, HE'S STILL NOT BANNED.

Here's the suggestion part: Make it so if a result is produced once by a semi valid(a user of sythe for example) source, staff DO NOT have to be able to reproduce the same result if legitimate proof comes forward from that user(like a picture of a skype resolver tying them together), and allow staff to issue bans on that evidence, users can always dispute.

The bar for having RSPS staff banned is absolutely ridiculous, the fact the guy even told me he's related to the owners and remains unbanned because staff cant reproduce the same skype resolve is ridiculous.

Now this is not bragging or anything else, but IF I cant get a RSPS staff banned, what chance does anyone else have, I mean seriously, do you know how many people I had to go to, to get that much information together, no average RSPS user on earth is able to gather that much information, and it STILL WASENT ENOUGH.

this was my parting comment:

[4/28/2016 6:50:19 PM] Gold-King/ Bus369- New Skype: don't blame me when this kid just keeps victimizing the rsps market, u saw he said he's an rspspk owner.
[4/28/2016 6:50:23 PM] Gold-King/ Bus369- New Skype: last thing I'm saying.
[4/28/2016 6:50:33 PM] Gold-King/ Bus369- New Skype: I gave u the best chance anybody in the entire industry had at stopping at owner.
Click to expand...