this is the only hint of intelligence i've seen in this thread so far
What you just posted was effectively spam. Very intelligent response, oh the irony.
We aren't discussing british or chinese history though. That's a pretty blatant appeal to ethos. I've studied economics and political science at a college level also, hear me roar! Luckily we aren't required source our arguments using MLA on these boards.
I'm aware that wiki pranks occur (very occasionally). However I doubt messing with the definition of anti-semitism happens to be a running gag. You can use google to find any information. It is the responsibility of the researcher to use what they deem to be legitimate and factual sources. You could find the exact same article on google that you could find on google scholar, or in a physical college library.
There are objective truths in quantitive and qualitative fields. Such as etymology. Such as the definition of anti-semitic (do you see where i'm going with this?)
Laughable. Quick everyone! Whatever you do, DON'T USE GOOGLE FOR ANYTHING VAGUELY RELATED TO WRITING AN ESSAY
Are you suggesting that you don't use google (or the internet for that matter) to fact check?
Anti-semetic isn't a word. It is just an improper spelling of "anti-semitic". I am aware that wiki pranks happen.
Well, you didn't know the definition of anti-semitic.
You're either trolling or incredibly ignorant. i'm out
All you just did was agree that I was right, then ramble on about nonsense. Point? Don't think you've made one single point so far, so maybe the spammer was right, leaving the thread was the only intelligent thing you've done.
