I don't know why but I think it's amazing...
Whatever is catchy is amazing to me, as it's the purpose of a signature.
Whatever is catchy is amazing to me, as it's the purpose of a signature.
My Next Sig
- Thread starter Noam
- Start date
Alot better than your previous, but still could use some work.
For starters, your text is alot better. A nicer, cleaner font and texture.
though others seem to like it, im not a fan of the messy background.
For starters, your text is alot better. A nicer, cleaner font and texture.
though others seem to like it, im not a fan of the messy background.
Nope.. this ain't gonna be the one.
Like alot of others have already suggested: completely none to nearly no flow is present.
The font looks dull, so does the texture.
Literally spammed brushes on top of it..
Overall: TOO MUCH HAPPENING.
You want to make it look soft and sweet, in the end, name signatures are advertisements, they should invite people, not scare them away.
I'd scrap the whole idea and start over, pick 3/4 colours and revolve around those, don't spam brushes like that again and stick to a nice piece.
Find a new, more solid font.. one that looks nice and proffesional, nothing too dull and nothing too extreme.
Make some lights that suit your needs, dont just throw something on there: stick to the 3/4 colour plan.
Don't use those huge brushes, they just swallow the whole idea of the signature.. they are way too big and way too bright, considering the main part of the sig is mainly dark.
Just.. redo it.. sorry to say..
This one ain't doing it for me.
Like alot of others have already suggested: completely none to nearly no flow is present.
The font looks dull, so does the texture.
Literally spammed brushes on top of it..
Overall: TOO MUCH HAPPENING.
You want to make it look soft and sweet, in the end, name signatures are advertisements, they should invite people, not scare them away.
I'd scrap the whole idea and start over, pick 3/4 colours and revolve around those, don't spam brushes like that again and stick to a nice piece.
Find a new, more solid font.. one that looks nice and proffesional, nothing too dull and nothing too extreme.
Make some lights that suit your needs, dont just throw something on there: stick to the 3/4 colour plan.
Don't use those huge brushes, they just swallow the whole idea of the signature.. they are way too big and way too bright, considering the main part of the sig is mainly dark.
Just.. redo it.. sorry to say..
This one ain't doing it for me.
Both basically, the new one seems slightly better, but even small things such as a more stable color scheme will change it around in a positive way
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2010
- Sythe Gold
- 93
- Messages
- 7,159
So I have learned something. CnC is very useful to gain technical skills ans understanding but you're never going to please other artists with a piece unless you show them something in it that they don't know how to do. Do what you think is best for your personal taste and rock it like a boss.
?
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2010
- Sythe Gold
- 93
- Messages
- 7,159
It's positive, you just gotta keep at it and you will get better fast.
wackywamba
Guru
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2005
- Sythe Gold
- 1
- Messages
- 1,358
For the new one -
It looks better, the white smudges at the back still look as if they don't fit. They look as if they're a completely different quality (lower) than the rest of the piece, the hexagon type shapes on the sides are nice though, more of that style would be good.
It looks better, the white smudges at the back still look as if they don't fit. They look as if they're a completely different quality (lower) than the rest of the piece, the hexagon type shapes on the sides are nice though, more of that style would be good.
Whatever you've done to the new one, I think it is absolutely amazing!
The Infamous Spam Forum King
I like it alot more than your previous idea. What font is that btw?
