Are Bigfoot and the Lochness monster real???

Discuss topic.

 

Bigfoot-no... Lochness maybe, there have been some plausible facts that can persuade the existence of the lochness monster

 

wow.... finn comented on my thread holy crap

 

No, they are not. Until evidence is brought to the table that is real (and I don't mean stupid fake pictures) they aren't. Also, if you were to respond saying "prove they aren't real then" your wrong again, simply because it is up to you to prove that it is real, then up to me to prove that it isn't real, if you understand what I'm saying.

 

No & Yes, It's a Topic that's 50% - Yes and 50% - No, Reasons;

YES - They both have some soft of "proof" of their existence, which shows that though they haven't been proven real, there could still be some existence of them, but said evidence has not been found yet.

NO - Like I've said before, Both have some sort of "proof" of their existence, though many basher's like to just not consider anything and be ignorantly swift in saying "Nope, definitely not real, and it NEVER WILL BE!!!!"

With these points comes the debate on God's Existence, People say "Just because there is no proof doesn't mean it isn't real" - With this statement the answer to the Question you've asked is Not Yes, nor is it No, It's Maybe.

 

Actually... Kind of.

I believe in Nessy, but not Bigfoot. No reason why, just how I feel.

 

>implying i believe in fairies
>>implying my logical reply was nonsense
>>>implying my reply was my opinion, which it was not

Flying Spaghetti Monster > you.

that is all.

 

Both.

I think that the Lochness is a prehistoric dinosaur, and there are a few still remaining. Alligators are prehistoric, only changing in size over time. I mean if you think about it, we have explored only 2% of the ocean which means there could possibly be more prehistoric things in the ocean we don't know about.

With Bigfoot, people can be 7' 6" its rare but still possible, why can't there be a rare gorilla that is this tall? We evolved from them, so I think its very possible.

Even better heres a gorilla walking upright showing the possibilities,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3nhz0FBHXs

 

Exactly!

 

The man that started rumours of Big Foot by so-called "capturing his image on a nature video" admitted (decades?) later that he faked it by dressing up in a costume.

Because of ^, I see no reason what-so-ever to believe in Big Foot.

The Lochness Monster? Meh, I dunno. Haven't looked into that at all, but several scientific expeditions have found nothing. So unless Nessie can dematerialize and rematerialize at will, I see no reason to believe in that either.

 

Interesting stories for sure, but totally not real.

 

I don't believe either of them are real. Rabidly evolving technology is making them less and less plausible.

 

I dont think they do.Just seems silly.

 

I believe that there might be something there wether it is bigfoot and the loch ness monster or not. All myth and legend come from a basis of truth so following on from Creggz's post it is basicaly 50/50. With the Loch Ness lake, when the did their most recent major search (late 90's early 2000's), there were abnormalitys on the scanner at the bottom of the lake, but the problem was it was too deap to dive.

They also think that their could be underwater tunnels leading to the ocean at the bottom of the lake which could mean that if the Loch Ness monster is real, then that is one of the reasons they never found it. The only way to get 100% proof would be to drain the entire lake to find out which would never happen.

With bigfoot, there is the possibility of him/it being real. There are millions of acres of Forrest in the Pacific Northwest region where most of the sightings have been, which makes it an ideal place to hide. Other than that since im not from America and havent done much research on the subject, i cant go into more details, but for both there is a huge possibility that they are real. Like i mentioned above for the loch ness monster, the only way to find out if bigfoot is real, would be to burn the entire forest down and search for remains but that is going to the extreme.

Its like saying is Atlantis real, and is one of the librarys burried under the right foot of the great sphynx. There is truth behind the Atlantis myth, and there is a chamber under the foot of the sphynx but no-one is allowed to excavate so it seems we will never know.

 

There is probably some realism behind the stories but they have probably both been blown out of proportion over time.

 

big foot? maybeh, well ive seen docmentarys on both so its hard to say, i tink id be moar fraid of teh lochness tho... x.x

 

The whole lochness monster thing started with 1 story, which was proven to be fake. Therefore, its not real. Bigfoot however i could see being real, but not like some mythical creature, more like a new species of monkey or something

 

The fable of them both have been going for decades, if they existed, they'll be dead now.

 

Couldn't help but think of this when I read the thread over again. xD

 

Which story was that?

Couldn't there be more if they did exist. How could one just be there, it would be more logical that there is more than one.