Reported Post by DOUBLES50NOWoC0M

DOUBLES50NOWoC0M · Apr 29, 2011

DOUBLES50NOWoC0M has reported a post.

Reason:

no contribution to thread
Click to expand...

Post: [TRUSTED] tags...
Forum: Suggestions
Assigned Moderators: N/A

Posted by: D2Killz
Original Content:

malakadang said: ↑

No support.

Traditionally people put tags on Sythe for what they ARE.

[DONOR] They ARE a donator, you cannot dispute this.
[MOD] They ARE a Mod, you cannot dispute this.
[ADMIN] They ARE an admin, you cannot dispute this.
[XXX Vouches+] They DO have these vouches, you cannot dispute this.
[OVER X$ handled!] They HAVE handled over X$, you cannot dispute this.

These are tags allowed because they are the truth, and you say someone is not an Admin when in fact they are.

[TRUSTED] There is no objectivity on this, no fixed foundation, therefore you CAN dispute this.
Lets say that there was a sticky, you MUST have over 150 Vouches to put the [TRUSTED] tag on your thread.
That implies that you are NOT 'TRUSTED' if you have 149 vouches.

Personally I think all subjective tags such as [TRUSTED] [FAST] [PROFESSIONAL] should be disallowed.

It's bad enough when we have thread titles like this.

[PP/WU/LR/AP/MB/OB/FACE 2 FACE/MAIL/BANK TRANSFER][MOD][OMM][999+ VOUCHES AND COUNTING][$50 DONOR][TRUSTED!] XXX GOLD SHOP [OVER 9000$ HANDLED][CS][FAST][PROFESSIONAL]

It's bad enough there are titles like this.

TLR - Who's to say who is trusted? Is there a certain vouch number where if your one below your not trusted? Is there a certain $ mark where once you cross it you become trusted? Theres already enough clutter in the thread titles, how about just scrap the ability to use such titles, since there pointless and misleading at times.
Click to expand...

This^
Click to expand...