Sotm

Discussion in 'Graphics Gallery' started by T R 1 B A L, Nov 7, 2011.

Sotm
  1. Unread #1 - Nov 7, 2011 at 12:55 PM
  2. T R 1 B A L
    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2007
    Posts:
    2,726
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    T R 1 B A L Grand Master
    Retired Sectional Moderator

    Sotm

    [​IMG]

    Opinions?
     
  3. Unread #2 - Nov 7, 2011 at 1:18 PM
  4. Vision Ex
    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2005
    Posts:
    2,522
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Vision Ex Veteran
    Retired Global Moderator

    Sotm

    I like the work done here, but was this done with a digital camera, because you'll likely want to use a lower ISO setting.

    The grain found in this picture looks like you were using a 400 speed black-and-white film camera, where in a digital work you should have set 1-2 speeds below maximum and used a tripod with a longer exposure to eliminate the archiving.
     
  5. Unread #3 - Nov 7, 2011 at 3:34 PM
  6. poopy2177
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Posts:
    1,359
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    poopy2177 Guru
    $5 USD Donor New

    Sotm

    I'm not a photographer type of person but wouldnt it look better if more if not all of the flower was sharpened?
     
  7. Unread #4 - Nov 9, 2011 at 11:17 AM
  8. T R 1 B A L
    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2007
    Posts:
    2,726
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    T R 1 B A L Grand Master
    Retired Sectional Moderator

    Sotm

    It was with a digital camera, and firstly it was a dark room and this was already on a very high aperture (either f2 or 1.8). Secondly, seeing as the depth of field is incredibly shallow, a mass of blur in the background (especially without bokeh or anything interesting) would fuck up the composition, and making the background flower slightly more grainy alleviates the problem for me. Lastly I'm an avid fan of film photography, with a few film cameras, so I personally prefer a more grainy photo (such as you said either 400 or 800 ISO b/w film), especially for still life photography, which is the reason I didn't reach for my tripod and just set the shutter speed to something slower.

    Shallow depth of field makes it sexier for me, and if more of it was in focus, the background wouldn't look as blurry (and would attract too much attention).
     
< Rate/Hate pls. | Another shop sig >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest


 
 
Adblock breaks this site