Who do you think is wrong here

First of all, I want to say that in no way am i racist. I hate racist people with a passion and would love the world to be rid of them. I can understand the black people of this neighborhood to be angry, but just saying that black people have a stereotype of being all "Gangster" and in a way this is not helping. They destroyed part of their area. I can understand them wanting to attack the Nazi's who were protesting in their neighborhood but they made matters worse by rioting and destroying their own home basically.

So what i am asking here is who do you think is at fault in this video. For me i think it is all three groups who are equally at fault.

1: The Nazi's for being racist, fascist scum.
2: The police/Authority for actually allowing the protest to go ahead.
3: The people from the neighborhood for damaging their own area.

Sorry about my long post, but i did not want to be flamed because of someone misunderstanding why i put this video up.

​

 

it's funny how they focus on black people ruining their neighborhood more than the event itself

 

I know, there is really no room in this world for Fascist dicks but because of them, they got the people in the neighborhood so angry that they ended up rioting and the news focused on that rather than the scum of the earth.

 

im going to have to say all the above lol 1,2,and 3

 

None of the options are right, they're all foolish.

 

What exactly do you mean?

 

The people in the neighborhood are definitely the ones who are least at fault. They can't really attack the Nazis considering the cops are basically defending them. If the cops weren't there, then those racist fucks would be torn to pieces. I'm sure most of the people rioting are geeked up on crack and the only logical thing to do in their rage filled mind is to destroy anything in their way. No it's not smart, but there are alot worse things they could've done. Honestly, I think the cops are the ones to blame since they had the ability to prevent it, but chose not to. In situations like these, the first ammendment should be ignored.