attack is too underpowered

Agreed

 

Why did you get attack? it isn't that hard to hit other ONE DEFENCE pures.

 

attacking is sort of " just powered "cause look it like this at level 80 u get a new kickass toy but its still shit fi you only have like 10 str you wont hit high.

 

Alot of pures stay 60 attack cause their broke ass noobs and know they'll never have a GS or they could afford it but suck at pking so they risk 130k instead.

 

All I know is, in boxing it makes a difference.

 

Maybe when fighting other pures with 1 defence. Now try to fight any account with 60+ defence with 60 attack.

 

Well you didn't specify what the account is for, but for times when you need to KO, str is important, but in staking where dps is all that matters, good luck winning duels with 60 attack against people with high defense.

 

You raging cause you lost a stake to someone with 60-80-60 when you have 70-60-70??

 

I kinda get where you're coming from, pisses me off having 75 attack super potted and then hitting 0-0 dds against 40 def unpotted.

 

IF defence is high attack makes you hit try experimenting it maybe in the dueling arena lol

 

I would consider the higher lv. weapons that you may use at higher attack lv.s give you extra "accuracy". So as long as you have the money to fund those attack lv.s "or the dung lv." then id say it is worth getting.

 

I completely disagree....

Attack is epic

 

how the fuck are you gonna compare 1 and 99 attack..

 

very mature

 

lol ok first off my stats are in my sig
85 attack (Pointless) 99 str 45 def 95 pray
and i dont stake

 

thats excatly what happend to me, i was 75 attack and i would get 40k xp/h when i trained and with 85 attack i still get the same amount

 

Attack is underpowered against PvP but against PvM it's fine.

I have 70 attack on my zerker and I frequently fight other zerkers and I somtimes have fail hits. 0 0 0 10 0 0 20 0 0 But against PvM it's like 25 32 16 0 17 22 26 etc.

Although, I don't agree about staying 60 attack, most people that do that is so they're low cb or they can't afford whip/ags pking.

 

I did exactly what you did, except in a more disturbing manour as to illustrate my point.

You posted nothing to be constructive in the conversation, you instead just reiterated a flawed statement.

OP isn't a 1 Defence pure, so I would think his opponents aren't 1 Defence either.

I can see where anyone is coming from, I have had DM's where I hit straight 0's for what seems like forever but I have also had DM's where my hitting streaks seem go on for their whole invent of food.

The point is, the "luck" of your hits can really piss you off or w/e, but at the end of the day higher attack does help. It always has for me on any of my accounts.

 

Higher attack helps greatly.....especially if you're fighting someone with a ridiculous defence level.

 

Zerk im lost on why your trolling because of peoples posts.

you posted this thread to obviously get a discussion going. And then you flame people who say otherwise on the start of the thread.

:l........?

You made this to see peoples opinions and such... and your starting fights hahaha.....?