He was unarmed.

I personally think that a member of the swat team got greedy and wanted the ''Kill Shot''.

Capturing him alive would mean going through the long bureaucratic process that is our penile system too.

 

You know he's not the only terrorist right?

A country as large and prominent as the United States isn't going to lie about killing a man that they've been after for who knows how long. They say they killed him, they did. I have no doubts that he's dead and no one else should either.

 

N4N0, the post report says that he was unarmed, but the fact of the matter isnt whether or not he was armed. I'll Explain why he was shot. Special Forces are split into 2 distinct areas of missions, there are apprehension missions and strict 'green light' kill missions. This was not to take Osama alive. When ST6 entered the room where Osama was, i give it 2-3 seconds before everyone in the room was dead. Kill Squads run in, kicking down doors, and people target different areas of the room, double tapping (1 to the chest, 1 to the head) anybody in sight. Its too bad he was unarmed because he was being shot at before it was even recognized.

 

Even though he was a CIA tactician..Harr Harr.

 

That's not what I meant. Let me rephrase.
Prove that Osama Bin Laden was responsible for 9/11 and not Bush.

 

Prove to me he didn't shoot anyone ever. He deserved what he got, he coulda been bombed and we couldnt' find him. Better this way.

 

Look up the money spent on just finding Osama Bin Laden...

There are many more alternatives to finding oil that could have been much cheaper.

 

Yeah I guess you're right,
hypothetical talk about stuff that we don't know is evidence enough?

No, you cannot know for sure what sums of money were spent on oil unless you're in a high power in the government.
You actually think they would post real numbers to show to the public? I doubt it.
This is a lot bigger than Osama Bin Laden if you ask me.

 

I would still like to know where all the oil is that we supposedly invaded Afghanistan and Iraq for.

 

How can you be so sure, and I'm not talking about common sense

 

Osama was a terrorist and killed many innocent Americans. He deserved to die, and I'm glad they shot and killed him instead of capturing him alive.

 

It's good he was shot on the spot, Sadam Hussain was given a fair trail and now he is worshiped as a god because he built so much sympathy, and now people pray at his tomb every day. I'm glad Osama's body was thrown into the ocean, otherwise some idiot would have dug it up to worship.

The fact that a man puts his hands up to surrender after killing thousands is a disgrace. Even now Osama built up so much sympathy from people that people believe it was wrong to kill him unarmed and he deserved a trial such as Sadam Hussain. If you gave Osama a gun and unarmed a bunch of troops. Tell me would Osama shoot, or not?

 

They said the plan was to capture him if he didn't resist in ANY way possible, he didnot listen to order they shot him. I think that cuz he was unarmed they should of catured him and potentially got some intelligent info on other operatives

 

This is a bunch of BullShit!
How can you all be so cold-hearted toward a person you have no evidence against?
Anybody could have been blamed for 9/11 and Americans, with their sorrowful cries, believed every fucking word that came out of Bush's mouth!
The guy's an idiot. He has no intelligence!

 

Explain your logic behind captured terrorists who told Indian/ London police they were trained the jihad way by Osama Bin Laden, and why Osama Bin Laden was found at rallies for the Mumbai attacks and was recruiting people to commit jihad. I don't believe the media and I don't believe the conspiracy theorists on the internet.

Here's one reason: remember when Saddam Hussain was captured and put on trial? How many tourists were executed in the time of Saddam Hussain's trial? terrorists used tourists as hostages and killed them off if they didn't get Saddam Hussain back. More people would have died, if your brother was in the war, and he was captured by the Taliban and used as a hostage. Would you tell the Taliban to execute him just so you can give Osama Bin Laden a fair trial?

Answer is no and with enough people taken in majority of the people would sympathize and believe Osama Bin Laden should be returned in exchange for the lives of several people. Before listening to the bullshit media and reading yahoo answers think logically about the several benefits of killing him on the spot.

 

I would have loved to hear him spill the truth about what really happened, and how he really "escaped capture" for 10 years when the whole world was "hunting" for him.

But I guess we will never know, because he was executed [unarmed and trying to surrender] so he couldn't tell the world the truth about what governments do.

All in all, I'm over it. I understand that the world will always be ignorant. Especially Americans [I suppose that's why I left the country ]

 

No, I have not had any relatives in the military.
And having a brother taken hostage would be horrible indeed, but because I have not had that experience I cannot relate in the emotional sense. That might be the only reason why you reject any possibility of a fair trial.
All I'm trying to say is that we should not blindly believe everything the government tells us. It will lead to missuse of power.

 

Very true. I don't know why people are complaining.

 

Who cares, he's dead and not much can be done about it now. Would you rather him pick up a gun and have been armed?

 

If everyone was dead in the room, and it was only special forces there as witness, if they REALLY wanted to cover it up they should of atleast planted guns with his prints on it or something.. instead they just said they popped him like a pimple

Fuck him