Ban the percent claims without evidence (Guides Section)

It's not a question of no support/support any more, it is now an enforcement under the Misrepresentation Act.

In real life, someone selling you a laptop from a shop, telling you that it was new, but later you find that it has scratches and has been used already and there is no way of returning it, is the same as telling someone how much of a percent a guide works.

 

lol'd
Karl pointed out there are already many restrictions on the market (nough said.)

There's no problem with people selling "this works 80%" of the time. If someone ends up buying such a guide, and it is false they can simply get a refund/make a ras. As well, people can't really "prove" this w/o ruining their guide.

Also, if my memory is right; neither unbanning guides or staking guides are allowed.

 

By all means, do join the side of those who like to scam innocent by passers who spend their money into this site and then make an extremely long complaint which takes a few weeks to sort out and then nothing gets sorted out and then no one gets their refund and then the person who scams goes looking for another prey and scams him again and then continues 'scamming' and then those predators leave this site in fury and never return losing a big sum of money for sythe meaning that sythe ends due to such a dishonest market.

Please, do.

 

This isn't real life. This is the internet. There is already enough restrictions, as stated by Karl. If you can't discern between a legit guide and a fishy guide, then in my opinion, you deserve to buy a guide that doesn't meet your expectations. You are seriously looking too much into this. Also, I am sure that Act is only enforceable upon users in the United States. So all the other users who use Sythe void out from that Act.

 

Of course this is real life? That is the pure reason why people on this site scam - because they think it has nothing to do with the outside world. If I receive a payment from this website, I can take that out into hard cash and then buy a chair with that money. How in the world is that not real life? I can then sell that chair on an auction website and send the money to a paypal account, later buying something from sythe.

Seeing as we have now established that this is 'real life', then now you should understand that all Laws should concern this website.

I won't even bother commenting on this outrageous comment.

The Act is Worldwide.

 

it does somewhat depend on how you execute the guide. maybe for him it works 99% of the time, because he knows how to do it very well.

other then that

support 100%

 

Not supporting what I'm saying, but in the sense of saving time it takes less time to solve a simple ban dispute from the one stupid person who bought a guide that is too good to be true, then it is to go through and check EVERY guide that has a percentage.

Said that a while ago, and it will and still apply in most cases.

People will always take the risk of buying an unverified guide because what is claimed is most likely NOT true.

If something is too good to be true then the buyer needs to use some common sense when buying the guide. Obviously someone SHOULD be skeptical about a "95% unban guide" because the odds of something like this being true is very unlikely. ALSO it is high;y unlikely someone selling a guide is going to scam more then one or two people, just because when someone does get scammed, they immediately go and post it in the thread.

The only probable fix to the "problem" your addressing is Plznate's idea, which should be implemented for other reasons besides this, but would be a solution to this issue.

 

When buying a guide your always taking a risk. It may work different for some than other % wise.

No support.

 

So it's your fault cause the guide you purchased was false? Makes alot of sense champ.

 

If it's not verified then yes it is. It's written in the stickies also.

 

You realize how retarded that is? Your telling me I say I have a glitch that makes you win 99% of stakes, but really about a percent, I'm not held liable? Should be banned on the damn spot.

 

You are held liable if the guide doesn't work at all.

You shouldn't be if the technique is difficult and some retard you sell it to can't do it right and loses an undisclosed amount of money.

The buyer should buy at their own risk, it's written all over the place, it's not very complicated.

 

Quit playing around. This is not a joke and needs to be implemented as soon as possible.

 

Who's playing around? This seriously will NOT happen unless the whole system is changed requiring every guide to be verified, which in a way it does. Also what do you do in a situation where the guide is difficult, the seller has mastered it, and can get it 90% of the time, and the people who buy it can only get 50% at first?

Is the seller "scamming" his customers because they can't do it right?

 

Umadbru?

Ahaha! He is being serious.

This doesn't have to be implement as soon as possible , infact who are you to tell mods what to do and when to do it?

This section is fine the way it is.

/Closethread?

 

You are only attempting to convince the people of sythe.org to commit an offence that the law states otherwise. I would suggest in not doing so.

 

Who's playing around? This seriously will NOT happen unless the whole system is changed requiring every guide to be verified, which in a way it does. Also what do you do in a situation where the guide is difficult, the seller has mastered it, and can get it 90% of the time, and the people who buy it can only get 50% at first?

Is the seller "scamming" his customers because they can't do it right?

I want to see what your views are on this.

 

You do realize Sythe isn't based out of the U.S. correct?.. U.S. does not dictate what the world does, hell the Government's Obama care is unconstitutional.

Answer Toasty's question, or I'll be thinking you're a master of puppets or something.

 

If it can't be proven easily, then don't put the percent? It is so simple to understand yet you seem so reluctant to want to comprehend it. If it can't be proven that the guide has for example a 99.9% ban rate, then don't put it!


" Is the seller "scamming" his customers because they can't do it right?" You've completely misunderstood the whole importance of this change. If someone makes a true claim, but the other person can't do it due to certain other reasons, then there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.

However, if someone makes a claim such as "99.9% of the time win at flower game" yet the games statistics prove that actually the chances of winning every time are incredibly lower, then yes they are in the wrong.

 

As I've stated already in this thread, the Act is Worldwide Legislation that does not concern a specific country only.