Halo Reach VS Black Ops

I support both to be honest, I enjoy the multiplayer AND the campaign.

I support Reach more though. I find that it's multiplay is better becuase they're really no campers besides shotgun faggots.

BO (or any cod) the spawns are absolutely fucking brutal, you kill somebody, 3 seconds later he's shooting ur back, and killing u in 2 bullets I may add.

Another downside to BO, 1-3 bullets from ANY gun will kill you, I'm not saying it doesnt take skill (becuase it clearly does) but I'd look at a player in halo with a 1.5 K/D much more respectable than a BO player with the same ratio.

I'd rather actually have a show down of weapons, put a little skill into it, beat down at the right time, and come out victorious despite the fact the other player was shooting first cause you know the timing and can play well.

So all in all, both games are great, but if u had $70 bucks to spend, and those 2 games were staring you in the face, I'd choose Reach 10 times out of 10.

 

I would say Black Ops just because I've never played Reach and probably never will.

 

Both are good games to play online but a lot of the people (11-15 year olds) playing black ops (xbox360) can be downright annoying!!!

 

Black ops because they copied reach and didnt come up with their own ideas Good job lazy bastards oh and i like cod

 

Halo Reach

Because i chop anyone/anything with a control in it's hand.

 

Halo!!!

 

Wow.. a 26-26 tie. Im gonna go with Black Ops just for all the content it has.

 

black ops, only because of zombies though.

 

Reach, because of said above about actually being able to shoot someone back when they find you first. Black Ops is basically a big game of cat and mouse.

Black Ops is also for PS3 and PC ontop of Xbox, fuckass.

 

Halo Reach, cause Reach was truely the Console FPS of the generation. Amazing graphics, music and gameplay.