PvP vs Old Wilderness

Unless you're a newfag, you should know ; old wildy > pvp

 

i agree. I dont see why people would even want how it is now. For example i just killed a guy with full rune on f2p i was risking full rune also at 95% ep i get 15 addy arrows plus rune dagger and like 2 cakes my ep goes to 12%?? how gay is that.

 

Old Wildy.

 

Both are unique in their own way, I like how Jagex implemented a loot potential but old wildy really made killing someone worth it. There would be a chance if you killed someone with atleast 60m in gear, you would get a 1-2m drop. If it were old wildy, you would be getting every bit of that 60m gear

 

Why take a chance and hope that you get decent loot in pvp when you are 100% guaranteed getting the loot from guy you killed?


Old Wildy for sho.

 

See above.

 

Btw pk = playerkill and pvp = player versus player which is virtually the same thing, so saying that wilderness is better than pvp is like saying food is better than sandwiches..

PVP is killing other people, even in the old wilderness.

 

well thats where your wrong lawlawlawl........sandwiches are always better no matter what.......and back to on-topic, although pvp means player vs. player we all recognize that it is referring to the pvp worlds that are currently in place so please do not knit pick at the details, especially if you didn't actually contribute anything to the conversation besides correcting someones verbage.

Whether old wilderness is "Better" or "worse", its fair. Whether you get 10k or 100mil from a loot, you deserved every bit of it because you downed that particular person who had all that gear with him. It was worth it to risk more because expensive gear generally has higher stats, meaning your less likely to die and more likely to kill someone else. It was a system, risk more, better chance to kill someone else that was risking alot.

 

old wildy

 

yes that is true.