Shorter wait between PM'ing.

Discussion in 'Denied Suggestions' started by Bluefirecorp, Dec 29, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Shorter wait between PM'ing.
  1. Unread #1 - Dec 29, 2010 at 5:17 PM
  2. Bluefirecorp
    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Posts:
    90
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Bluefirecorp Member
    Banned

    Shorter wait between PM'ing.

    I run my services via PM, and normally have to send out 10-20 PMs a day. I do it all at once to save time for all sites. However Sythe tends to really slow me down, waiting 1 min between messages.

    I'd love a way to reduce the wait time between sending PMs without increasing spam. An idea would be making it a paid rank, and even with that, you still have to wait 5 seconds between PM'ing (this knocks out most spammers). Or just have a PM limit of 20 per half an hour or something?
     
  3. Unread #2 - Dec 29, 2010 at 5:21 PM
  4. Coinshare
    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2010
    Posts:
    2,789
    Referrals:
    4
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Coinshare Grand Master
    Banned

    Shorter wait between PM'ing.

    I agree, sometimes I get a bunch of PMs then I have to wait each minute. I usually type them out really fast so it's an even worse wait because whatever I type is usually fast.
     
  5. Unread #3 - Dec 30, 2010 at 12:35 PM
  6. ChristmasCracker
    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2010
    Posts:
    3,678
    Referrals:
    4
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    ChristmasCracker Lord ChristmasCracker
    Banned

    Shorter wait between PM'ing.

    1min is a bit high.
    Around 30 seconds would be fair ( Time to read the pm + to load the reply page)
     
  7. Unread #4 - Dec 30, 2010 at 12:39 PM
  8. Voltaire
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Posts:
    36
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Voltaire Member
    Banned

    Shorter wait between PM'ing.

    The wait is to decrease server-load. It is perfectly fine, 1 minute is nothing.
     
  9. Unread #5 - Dec 30, 2010 at 5:09 PM
  10. Bluefirecorp
    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Posts:
    90
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Bluefirecorp Member
    Banned

    Shorter wait between PM'ing.

    Even then I would still have to wait 20 seconds between each PM. I only fill in 2 short strings (name, and 8 digits)..other than that I just use a template >.<

    Not if you have to send out 50 PMs.
     
  11. Unread #6 - Dec 30, 2010 at 8:01 PM
  12. The Pkkid V6
    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2005
    Posts:
    2,875
    Referrals:
    3
    Sythe Gold:
    13
    Pokémon Trainer Two Factor Authentication User Tier 1 Prizebox

    The Pkkid V6 Grand Master
    $50 USD Donor New

    Shorter wait between PM'ing.

    I think 45 seconds would be easier >.<
    Sometimes I open all my PM's in different tabs, and end up not sending one because of the wait =/
     
  13. Unread #7 - Dec 30, 2010 at 10:03 PM
  14. Nick
    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2007
    Posts:
    7,204
    Referrals:
    40
    Sythe Gold:
    80

    Nick ♬♩ Young Forever ♪ ♫

    Shorter wait between PM'ing.

    I'd support giving donators a shorter time period or no wait at all.
     
  15. Unread #8 - Dec 31, 2010 at 6:15 PM
  16. Bluefirecorp
    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Posts:
    90
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Bluefirecorp Member
    Banned

    Shorter wait between PM'ing.

    I tend to do the same. It's really annoying, even more so when the PM contains data that I can't get back..so I have apologize for the lack of that info.. :(

    I'd honestly pay 5 bucks to get a shorter waiting time tbh.
     
  17. Unread #9 - Dec 31, 2010 at 6:30 PM
  18. I'm Still Breathing
    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2009
    Posts:
    489
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    I'm Still Breathing Forum Addict

    Shorter wait between PM'ing.

    I'd guess that the 1 minute timer is there to prevent spam bots, so what if just made it so anybody with 50+ posts wait time was lowered?
     
< Rename the Diablo II and III section | When free trade comes out... >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.


 
 
Adblock breaks this site