Try to reach 1,000,000 replies!

for a random 1000 people?

yes. even if it was someone i knew or loved. millions would still be saved.

 

plz mr.clash

 

Life balance people.

 

plz mr.clash

 

Life balance people.

 

plz mr.clash

 

its those faggots' own fault they get aids :twisted:

j/k id kill 5000 people if i had to

 

plz mr.clash

 

its those faggots' own fault they get aids :twisted:

j/k id kill 5000 people if i had to

 

plz mr.clash

 

yeah i would beacuse it would kill 1000 instead of killing 2.5 million pepole a year so yeah i guess i would

 

plz mr.clash

 

yeah i would beacuse it would kill 1000 instead of killing 2.5 million pepole a year so yeah i guess i would

 

plz mr.clash

 

To me, 1000 lives lost barely compares against the millions of lives that would benefit from a cure.

 

plz mr.clash

 

To me, 1000 lives lost barely compares against the millions of lives that would benefit from a cure.

 

plz mr.clash

 

I approve; however to all those that approve as well, I just want you to know something.


During WWII the Nazi party and Hitler killed twins, deformed men/women/children and a lot of other people that may not be considered "normal" to the population at that time. He bisected them, had them electrically shocked, burned, any possible thing that may help them find a cure to the "abnormality". At the time it seemed perfectly reasonable, however today it could be considered "pointless slaughter" for unknown reasons, because the Nazi party was a bloodthirsty soulless bunch. WRONG. They had the same intentions as you would if you approved of killing 1,000+ people to find a cure for Aids, at the time it seemed like a honorable thing to do; even if it involved killing countless amounts of people. They just wanted to find a cure.

If we test on a few thousand people to look for cures by any means possible, what opinions will people have about our time period in the future?

 

plz mr.clash