Pardon Process

I Think the idea of upper Staff decision Vote would work more thoroughly then just one. Sure All staff should get to make a healthy debate and place their issues forward, But (and correct me if I'm wrong) most of the members applying for high pardons that would have more of a chance of getting accepted may of happened years prior to applying, so Globals would have more personal connections or experience's with the individuals.

I also think for instants, someone scammed by someone applying for a high pardon, should get the right to write a a comment(as long as its reasonable) and placed on their post.

 

About all staff discussing the ideas: Sectionals are still going to be too easily swayed by people to be able to discuss pardons fairly. Their unfair discussions then may influence the vote, which is not something that is desirable.

 

I agree.

/calls for implementation

 

I think they should repay the scammed victim and start over in a NEW account - then that would be fair.

 

So they can possibly scam again on their new account? Not a good idea.

 

Hi guys. I discussed this with Sythe and he was in agreement.

Changes:

- All staff can now offer their opinions publicly on pardon request threads.
- If there appears to be general consensus on the public request thread, the thread will be moved and voted on by upper staff members.
- The individual ability of Administrators to pardon has been removed.

Hope this is a welcome change. Feel free to offer feedback in the appropriate section!