20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

Discussion in 'RuneScape 3 General' started by Ownedyou!, Dec 23, 2010.

20k-25k votes an hour is bad?
  1. Unread #21 - Dec 23, 2010 at 6:51 PM
  2. purepk244
    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2010
    Posts:
    474
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    purepk244 Forum Addict

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

    Its not bad when you think about the fact that, 20k votes p/h means 1/5th + of the players playing voted (the other 4/5 probably already voted)
     
  3. Unread #22 - Dec 23, 2010 at 7:25 PM
  4. 153biggs
    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2009
    Posts:
    259
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    153biggs Forum Addict

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

    My theory along with many other threads supporting this is that they see an opportunity to release the wild back and give the vast majority what they want. Restoring the Runescape name while profiting and looking like they care what they player base thinks. Personally I think its coming out no matter what, I doubt they would stir up so much commotion during the holidays to just f us over.
     
  5. Unread #23 - Dec 23, 2010 at 7:55 PM
  6. Themaulpure
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Posts:
    875
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Themaulpure Apprentice

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?


    Deep down I believe this also, although I feel as if I still have some doubts... Jagex has screwed us over in the past....
     
  7. Unread #24 - Dec 23, 2010 at 8:05 PM
  8. 153biggs
    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2009
    Posts:
    259
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    153biggs Forum Addict

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

    They have, but to me I fell as if they do screw us they can say bye bye to runescape. They have all the old players back being re-interested in this game. So many games haven't fulfilled the old thrill of runescape pking. And runescape was a notable game because of it. I think with there "new ways" of catching macro users (which you can't deny botting has become more difficult, on top of they say they have a big new way to catch botters) they see an opportunity to breath life back into the game and restore it to its former glory.
     
  9. Unread #25 - Dec 23, 2010 at 8:48 PM
  10. BEYOND REASON
    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2010
    Posts:
    1,612
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    BEYOND REASON Guru
    Trade With Caution

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

    I don't think they could offer us something this big and then say wait no, we've changed our minds.

    They will lose a lot of paying customers.
     
  11. Unread #26 - Dec 23, 2010 at 9:00 PM
  12. Punchy
    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Posts:
    1,451
    Referrals:
    2
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Punchy Guru
    Banned

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

    this is actually what i was thinking here, they think older rs pkers will come back :p
     
  13. Unread #27 - Dec 23, 2010 at 9:07 PM
  14. BEYOND REASON
    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2010
    Posts:
    1,612
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    BEYOND REASON Guru
    Trade With Caution

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

    Yeah that is what they are trying to do, get a large population of people to come back and start paying money for membership.

    They are giving something to us but they are also gaining.
     
< tassies or prayer | If the wildy returns, what happens to the items? >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest


 
 
Adblock breaks this site