20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

Discussion in 'RuneScape 3 General' started by Ownedyou!, Dec 23, 2010.

20k-25k votes an hour is bad?
  1. Unread #1 - Dec 23, 2010 at 3:41 PM
  2. Ownedyou!
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Posts:
    106
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Ownedyou! Active Member
    Banned

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

    As we some of you may know the votes are gonna slow down dramatically at some point, but isnt it too soon? what happened to the large amount of wildy hungry people + voting botters? i thought the votes will be averaging 70k-50k/hr votes an hour for 2 days? i just checked now its like 20k-25k votes/hr.

    what do you think, i dont want to sound like a retard and if i did sorry... :love:
     
  3. Unread #2 - Dec 23, 2010 at 3:44 PM
  4. BEYOND REASON
    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2010
    Posts:
    1,612
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    BEYOND REASON Guru
    Trade With Caution

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

    Well the probably think they've reached the point where the no votes could not go higher.
     
  5. Unread #3 - Dec 23, 2010 at 3:46 PM
  6. ElijahBossin
    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2010
    Posts:
    56
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    ElijahBossin Member
    Banned

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

    Not everyone has more then 1 account lol
     
  7. Unread #4 - Dec 23, 2010 at 3:46 PM
  8. Classics
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2010
    Posts:
    2,261
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Classics Grand Master
    Banned

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

    This ^ and now that mod mark says there is going to be a phase 2 who knows what will happen. And to the poster above me you can vote with any random name that has ever been made.
     
  9. Unread #5 - Dec 23, 2010 at 3:46 PM
  10. uselesspoop
    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2007
    Posts:
    1,670
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    uselesspoop Guru
    Banned

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

    nope 20k-25k/hr is very good considering most of the heat has died off ...
     
  11. Unread #6 - Dec 23, 2010 at 3:47 PM
  12. Ownedyou!
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Posts:
    106
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Ownedyou! Active Member
    Banned

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

    i was not expecting this.. does this mean that we wont reach our 3m goal at this rate, because it might slow down even more.
     
  13. Unread #7 - Dec 23, 2010 at 3:48 PM
  14. Pokerking88
    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2010
    Posts:
    5,014
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Pokerking88 Hero
    Banned

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

    This.
    25k votes an hour is still good, hopefully it doesnt go down more.
     
  15. Unread #8 - Dec 23, 2010 at 3:49 PM
  16. me hotur not
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2009
    Posts:
    549
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    me hotur not Forum Addict

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

    Don't forget, the votes lasting till 15th January, so it should get enough votes.

    Approximately 20 days until the vote ends, which is 480 hours. If there was 7,000 votes and hour, there would be another 3,360,000 votes.
     
  17. Unread #9 - Dec 23, 2010 at 3:52 PM
  18. BEYOND REASON
    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2010
    Posts:
    1,612
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    BEYOND REASON Guru
    Trade With Caution

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

    I don't think it was ever supposed to reach 3 million votes.
     
  19. Unread #10 - Dec 23, 2010 at 3:56 PM
  20. Itz Me
    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2010
    Posts:
    1,416
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Itz Me Guru
    Banned

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

    24 x 25000 = 600k

    600k votes per day.

    10 days = 6m votes

    Still pretty damn good.
     
  21. Unread #11 - Dec 23, 2010 at 3:58 PM
  22. Pokerking88
    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2010
    Posts:
    5,014
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Pokerking88 Hero
    Banned

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

    Thats if only the voting doesnt go down, which I thinkm it will. 6million votes would be great.
     
  23. Unread #12 - Dec 23, 2010 at 3:58 PM
  24. Ownedyou!
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Posts:
    106
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Ownedyou! Active Member
    Banned

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

    Jagex basicly said fuck no to 100k votes, and perhaps not even 1m votes. so the goldilocks number "goldilocks" meaning not to much, not too less; is 3m.
     
  25. Unread #13 - Dec 23, 2010 at 4:13 PM
  26. Dingo212
    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2005
    Posts:
    1,284
    Referrals:
    3
    Sythe Gold:
    14

    Dingo212 Guru

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

    3 million votes is enough and should encourage them interms of money coming into the company. I would guess they are suffering in money interms of developing that other game of theirs.

    This maybe the original intention but want to convince the nay-sayers that they are nothing to them (JagEx) by saying "look 3 million said yes"
     
  27. Unread #14 - Dec 23, 2010 at 4:16 PM
  28. BEYOND REASON
    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2010
    Posts:
    1,612
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    BEYOND REASON Guru
    Trade With Caution

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

    Well the no votes would never reach 3 million, even with the help of people botting no votes..
     
  29. Unread #15 - Dec 23, 2010 at 4:23 PM
  30. Ownedyou!
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Posts:
    106
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Ownedyou! Active Member
    Banned

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

    gratz u found out about phase 2, please understand i woken up to..
     
  31. Unread #16 - Dec 23, 2010 at 4:27 PM
  32. BEYOND REASON
    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2010
    Posts:
    1,612
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    BEYOND REASON Guru
    Trade With Caution

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

    I think the second phase doesn't really mean anything and they are just buying some time to work on or add the old system back into the game.
     
  33. Unread #17 - Dec 23, 2010 at 4:37 PM
  34. Themaulpure
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Posts:
    875
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Themaulpure Apprentice

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

    I know there will be a "phase 2" and such (meaning the original vote won't matter), but I still feel uncomfortable that it's under 2million votes. Lets hit that 2000k!
     
  35. Unread #18 - Dec 23, 2010 at 4:40 PM
  36. slayorz
    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2010
    Posts:
    315
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    slayorz Forum Addict
    Banned

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

    They should have made this vote the day they changed the wilderness. It would have gotten changed back immediately :p.
     
  37. Unread #19 - Dec 23, 2010 at 4:51 PM
  38. BEYOND REASON
    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2010
    Posts:
    1,612
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    BEYOND REASON Guru
    Trade With Caution

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

    But they want to create suspense, to reel in even more money + they have ads on the page.
     
  39. Unread #20 - Dec 23, 2010 at 5:13 PM
  40. Determinate
    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Posts:
    10,394
    Referrals:
    3
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Determinate Legend
    Banned

    20k-25k votes an hour is bad?

    This seems like a good estimate.
    I think we can expect about 3-4m votes in total.

    I completely agree with you on that one.
    The '2nd phase' just seems like bullshit designed because Jagex realized they needed some time.
     
< tassies or prayer | If the wildy returns, what happens to the items? >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest


 
 
Adblock breaks this site