Pedophilia

Well, thoughts do appear every once in awhile. But the ability to shove those thoughts away is important. And its what i can do. Having enjoyment in thinking about intimate acts with little kids is just nasty.

 

you seriously believe, it's ok to think about having sex with a baby? o 3 year old child? a 6 year old child? any children? no, it's not right, whether they do it, or even think/fantasize about it...

 

Yes i do believe that is alright because it reality it is. Is it accepted? No because people are already inclined to believe all people with these thoughts act upon them or will act upon them because that's just what people with these thoughts do right?

The simple one-side mindedness is amazing to me, it's alright to find feet sexy, someone of the same sex, someone of the opposite sex, or even pain as a sexual stimulant but because they are choosing children as their source of pleasure then a persons HIDDEN pleasure that they prefer as their turn on which once was taboo has become a form of mental crime to people. When in actuality they never did anything except accept their desires but never acted upon them.

 

You make it sound like a Pedophile thinks about a child once, and thats it.

If someone is continually thinking about doing things to children, even to the extent where he desires it.

Even if he doesnt act on it, its still completely wrong, and should be monitored.

Just in the case that one day, he does act on it.

 

Ffs double post. Got Proxy Error, thought it didnt post

1000 postcount, fail way to get it :S

 

Alright, then every man in the U.S. should be monitored as well, just in case that one day they decide to act on their feelings and rape a woman/another man.

Every teacher should be monitored Just in case that one day comes when they decide to sleep with a student or take advantage of one.

Every person in the U.S. should be forced to keep a dream log and turn it into the police, lying about ones thoughts have now become a crime, but we do it Just in case that one day comes that someone with perceived "bad thoughts" acts on them.

Do you see how idiotic this sounds? If you want to do it to only people who think of children then why not anyone that can cause any harm ever in any situation no matter what?

 

You make it sound like every thought a pedophile has about children is horrible and involves either molesting/raping the child. Yeah maybe some pedophiles have those kinds of thoughts, and I agree, those people are some serious sick fucks. Though the thing most pedophiles enjoy about children is the innocence about them, and would never do anything to harm a child, instead they choose to admire them and their beauty.

and no, I'm not a pedophile myself.

 

Gay sex can be had by 2 consenting adults. The difference being pedophilia is between one adult and a child, it shouldn't matter about desires and what your born thinking. You still dont have the right to strip a child of there dignity.

 

We're not talking about the sexual act in itself. Yes we get gay sex is 2 consenting adults and pedophelia involves a minor....no shit...

What we're trying to get across is the fact that THIS part isn't happening, there is no sexual conduct being had with the people we're defending. They are simply hated for their thoughts when they are doing nothing wrong.

 

Thoughts aren't bad. Thoughts never hurt anyone. It horrifies me that this is even a discussion.
The problem comes when people assume that any sexual contact with a child is life-ruining for the child. Most pedophiles, when they have sex with children, do not rape, rape, torture, or otherwise harm them. Child-lovers generally enjoy seeing the kids get pleasure. The life ruining only happens when their therapist tells them they're supposed to be traumatized.

 

Whoa...took a whole different approach than the rest of the thread lol...
There's also that very small problem with it not being legal...ya know...to have sex with a child..

 

If you believe that illegal = wrong then you need to open your eyes.

 

I've always wondered if that is actually truth.

 

The only product of loving, gentle, consensual sex is pleasure.

 

Having actual sexual intercourse with a child? Then yes that is illegal lol, it's a not a matter of only if a believe it is or not it is illegal lol.
I don't believe anything is wrong or right, while i can put in my opinion on some things i won't declare something wrong or right just is it is just or unjust.

I need to open my eyes? To what?

 

From what I've read this is an ethical discussion rather than a legal one. To bring the law into it tells me that you associate legal/illegal with right/wrong. Obviously I know that sex with children is illegal. My point was that illegal doesn't always mean wrong. That is important to understand regardless of your position on child love. The government shouldn't be instilling morals in you.

 

To bring up the ethical side of an argument and not take into account the legal side is a pathetic way to ensue a debate.
I bring the law in because it doesn't quite represent what I believe is right and wrong, but it does commonly represent the larger populations opinion.

Whether the idea of this being wrong or right is up to person to person, you also have to take into the account of a child being able to logically determine what he perceives as pleasure/pain, right/wrong and since he/she is not at a developmental stage that can produce this logically thought out decision with enough reason to back it up to the fullest then yes child love is wrong in that sense.

 

If sex with children was made legal tomorrow would that change anything regarding it's status as right or wrong? All the law means is that you can be punished for doing it.

Are you saying that a child can't differentiate pleasure from pain until they hit puberty? That's insane. If thats not what you're saying then please rephrase it as it doesn't make sense to me.

 

With a logical reasoning? No they can't. They understand pleasure and pain but they will not understand the situation. Thus why the age of consent is commonly set higher because they need the time to get to a higher developmental stage to determine the situation with better precision.

 

You're not explaining your point well. I have no idea what you're trying to say.