Dds better then dragon claws read why.

Claws are a LOT more accurate, and the spec is great (also because of the delayed animation when speccing). Without spec it's bad but hey, so is the dds

 

...your just writting this because you get owned by d clawers and cant afford you own pair.
gf.

 

sad really, i have full bandos and ags and sgs i can afford d claws. its a waste and really most of the noobs who use d claws fail when they try to spec me when i have full dharoks on. i get hit like 20-7-4-1 im getting owned eh? then i 60 on the noob and ko them? or they pj me and they fail but i give them credit for the attempt and after they fail they tele or run rofl.

 

id rather buy a ags then d claws ages hits 70s

 

I'll just wait for the Dragon (unmade weapon goes here) comes out.

Although, Dragon Claws are useless without 80+ attack. The specials just don't work without high attack...

 

They were never meant to be that good.
When they came out, it was only 100k LOL!

 

I Hate d claws, the price is pathetic and stupid.

 

1428 dds or 1 d claw

dds's thanks.
due to the claws will probably drop in price within a month becouse they are starting to get realy common.

 

I don't know what you're smoking but maybe you should look at the actual stats of both weapons before you make incorrect assumptions and see that dragon claws are A LOT more accurate than daggers. The only reason a dds would be better for PKing is price, any other reason is bull.

 

wow I always tought d claws were better then dds u sure?

 

Yeah I agree the Dds is better, D Claws are overpriced and aren't that much better.

 

Yeah I agree the Dds is better, D Claws are overpriced and aren't that much better.

 

Dragon Claws are utterly inaccurate without my forementioned 80+ attack.
Whilst the DDS is relatively accurate and powerful with 65+.

Dragon Claws will dominate PvP with 95+ attack. I've seen a number of people with 99 attack use them, and well...

Your opponent stands almost no chance.

 

Well what if this happens when your using your full dharoks : You get TBed, Barraged, Smited, and then k0ed eventually. GF 10m?
And if people got 100s of mills to spend, then why should they buy a 40k weapon instead of a powerful 100m one. You can't buy good weapons from a NPC for 40k. Just like how you can't buy a GS from a NPC.

You said that you can hit 40-20-10-10. Well thats 80 damage right there... Which is enough to k0 some players. A k0 with one spec? Thats awesome..

Now think of it this way :
You barrage someone, get them to about 500hp. If they use magic pray, then take out your whip, and if they use meele wait untill they use magic pray. When their hp goes under half take out claws and finish the job. With a dds that barely works. It is too slow even though more accurate.
And if claws were the price you guys think they should be, everyone would have them.

 

Its looking like to time to bust out the maths books and create a ridiciously long equation just to prove the DDS are better? Don't tempt me guys...

 

Do it James, hahah.

I like DDS's better, they are cheaper, plus they can hit the same maybe more then Dclaws total specs?

 

I would like to tempt you. How about you do it.

 

Hmm. I wonder why.
Ah! Maybe because they are the best KOing weapon that exists.

 

claws are straight, but i do like dagger more. I don't pvp much, but i always like to use SOL special when someone's about to claws fuck me. then they're standing there like "damn" because for a lot of people, all they know how to do is claw spec.

imo, they're pretty much tied with AGS/SGS and Claws, seeing as you can KO good with any of them.

 

no d claws maybe 50m but its good in +1 worlds