Aloe Market manipulation ban dispute

Link to/reason for TWC/DNT/Ban:LightGP and Aloe market manipulation
Link to your vouches: Aloe's Vouch Thread
Detailed description of the events that took place and why you disagree with the decision: I got reported for having my own infernal thread whilst working for another thread. This is correct, I don't deny that.
The issue I have is that, I remember that last year when this rule was changed, some capers got warned by sythe staff for having their own thread whilst working in another one, but then also got told it's fine as long as the capers aren't quoting the client. I stopped working for Light after the rule for about a month, but returned since everybody in the infernal section was still doing the same thing. More than 50% of infernal threads are not unique workers.
If you want to enforce this rule, does it not seem like a better idea to message everyone working for more than 2 threads and stop them from doing so?
I mean it's rediculous, one guy works for almost 6 threads, and theres also multiple members with their own thread that also work for other threads.
If you're going to ban me for this, you might aswell ban 50% of the infernal section.
Link to previous disputes: have none
Anything else you wish to say: Ideally I'd have every thread require an unique infernal worker, maybe verify with sythe? It seems stupid how it's not allowed to work for another thread whilst having your own thread, but it's allowed to work for 10 threads whilst not having your own thread.