Infraction Dispute

The Viper is terribly fucked in the head. The thread goes as follows:

My response was..

This is a very legitimate response. While it is hostile and negative, it can not be deemed unintelligent because it accurately contributes to the thread by directly answering the question that the creator of the thread asked. Furthermore, if Finniscool, being the administrator that he is, who posted in this very same thread, didn't feel the need to infract me, who's to say this sissy slut whore should?

 

Injustice has been, once again, exercised. Apparently, I hurt his feelings this time.

 

NO, your statement, "'Fuck them All' is not intelligent, contrary to what you believe" is unintelligent, contrary to what you believe. I backed my statement up with logic and reasoning. You, on the other hand, have failed to back up your worthless opinion. I demand you repeal these two infractions or I will have you stripped of your powers. I have spoken.

 

You really don't get it do you. The infraction was warranted, as the post is "unintelligent". Also, threatening and flaming staff members will get you no where. It will only result in the accumulation of more infractions. You've been infracted on the above post for threatening a staff member.

 

My question is WHY is the post unintelligent? Also, I quote my first post that has yet to be answered..

Also, how contradictory for you to force me to go by the rules when you, in an attempt to inflict punishment on my acct for breaking a certain rule, don't even respect this very same rule you are punishing me for. Talk about abuse of power.

You are an imbecile beyond belief. Obviously I was jokingly sarcastic in my response when I stated, "I demand you repeal these two infractions or I will have you stripped of your powers. I have spoken.", therefore, I demand you repeal this infraction or I will have you stripped of your powers as well. I have spoken once more.

 

Since when was a title as useless as "Head User Educator" given the authority to infract, let alone allowed to infract out of his/her own section? Bless you Runescape children.

 

Uh, excuse me? Head User Educator is in charge of the user education section, and is therefore a moderator.

 

The original infraction was indeed justified as it is spam in a debate forum.

 

ALL OF YOU MODERATOR'S KEEP SAYING THE SAME THING. I HAVE OFFERED MY THOUGHTS AS TO WHY IT IS NOT SPAM; YOU HAVE YET TO RESPOND TO MY ARGUMENT. I DEMAND JUSTICE.

Steph was way, way cooler than you.

 

I'm not trying to be Steph, so why would you make that comment?

 

I made the comment because you are a bandwagon hopper like the rest the n0obiez on this forum. Think for yourself and try not to be afraid to break barriers for once? After all, this is just a forum that you slave away for in return for absolutely nothing.

Also, you are a girl. In comparison to Steph, Steph is a cooler girl. While you are not trying to be like Steph, you unintentionally share basic traits with Steph power-wise and physically, therefore causing me to draw comparison between the two of you. Nothing personal; just saying.

 

That's just the way you see it. Maybe if you took the time to get to know me, you'd think different. Goodbye for now.