Moon Landing A Hoax?

What does that mean? Nothing.

So It came back after 1 day?

Doesn't really mean that it went to the moon.

 

not one day.

july 16-24.

8 days

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_11 (reference, right details column)

 

there is a stick, but it still doesnt explain how it rippled in the "wind"

 

Swift, watch the mythbuster video, shows the momentum in a vacuum makes it move.

 

Earlier you said that they did it to save money, why spend the money to launch the rocket in the first place to ruin it like you said it was. Wouldn't it be just a smidge bit more money to actually take it to the moon? All you do is coast mainly.

 

A smidge bit eh? Its much cheaper to launch, orbit earth for 8 days, then return than it is to travel 370,000 KM there and back. Honestly... think b4 you comment.

 

Honestly, I was simply asking a fucking question. Kiss mah ass bitch.


Also, the vids are shit.

 

Nty, and i cant help the vids.

 

Your reply has absolutely no relevance to the topic we are debating about. Also its quite rude. Why do you think the videos are inappropriate? Perhaps you can state you opinion on them?

 

My first post:

My second post was in response to the nub reporting me, but nothing happened because he also doesn't like swift either.

 

Please stay on the topic of whether or not the moon landing was a hoax.
Any further off-topic posts or personal attacks will result in infractions.

 

Could be very Possible. I just Wonder, If they visited it before, why not Visit now, if they had the technology before, although our economy is flooding.

 

I think its real, i mean really your just LOOKING for things that make it seem fake, which when looked for can come up.

As for the no wind on the moon, there is resistance when movment is introduced.

the moon DOES have an atmosphere meaning there HAS to be some resistance.

 

I don't believe the moon landing was a hoax, solely because the logic behind it is faulty.

What would our government have to gain from faking a moon landing that would surely cost a fair bit of money, considering the time period? It's not like Russia was just going to give up on getting to the moon because they weren't the first there.

 

Is it that they had the technology then, or that the didnt but wanted the communist nations to believe that they did. Assumptions are powerful when taken the right way. For another nation to believe that their enemy has a far superior computer and guidance systems than they do is a real shock. It makes the want to back down and to not do anything that would cause the US to "become upset" because they think that the US is "better" now.
Shock and awe factor.

You may or may not be correct, but please explain the wires and the 3 lights.

They have everything to gain. A huge morale boost for the american people, a morale drop for the russians. Instilled the knowledge of american space superiority in the russians and chinese. They quit trying for the moon because we already "controlled" it. The old saying is "air supremacy ensures victory," apply the same concept to space supremacy. It "scared" the communists away from opportunity.

 

We went Swift, watch the videos. You have an argument, but yours isn't a very good one. We have footage, how can it have been faked? Please?

Flag- Proved
Jumping- Proved
Footprint- Proved

I mean- what else do you want to know?

Laser pointed at the moon and returns- proved

 

All you say is "proved" after each with no concluding evidence. Show me where this "proof" comes from and I may entertain it. Until then, I'm staying with my decision. The moon landings we're possibly a hoax and there is not enough evidence to prove them right or wrong.

 

Hmm? HAHA (this is a joke, so dont take it serious people.)

Might as well just release this vid to the public because its about all i believe right now.

 

Swift, Watch the videos.

They go into about... 8 minutes of proof, so how about you stop being lazy and actually watch them.. I'm not trying to be mean, you should just watch them, they put a lot of "fake" looking events into perspective.

 

My videos are all evidence of a hoax conspiracy. Where are the videos you talk about? And if you're referring to the Mythbusters ones, then sure they look true. Mythbusters are supposed to make the common knowledge seem true. They cant bust a government secret like that, even if they label it plausable. If the secret actually gets out, everyone will lose faith in their government. 9-11, Pearl Harbor, JFK assassination, Moon landing, Oklahoma City bombing, etc, etc, etc. All fakes.