The axist of all the world's terrorism

I am not racist against people from Pakistan. I am simply against the government of Pakistan, and the existence of the country Pakistan.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/hindi/regionalnews/story/2009/04/090401_manmohan_pakistan_va.shtml

Pretty much, Manmohan Singh condemns Pakistan's government, asserts that they were responsible for the Mumbai attacks (though Pakistan denies it) and that the government has done nothing to neutralize Lashkar-e-Tayiba, the militant group responsible for these attacks.

Simply put, Musharraf is a terrorist. The ISI is a terrorist organization. The world has a responsibilty to ensure that Pakistan is rid of the Taliban and Al-Qaeda, since Pakistan's military obviously cannot do it themselves. India has the military power to regain all the land that Jinnah swindled from us in 1947 (as demonstrated by the wars fought in 1947, 1965, 1971, and 1999) without any effort.

People must acknowledge the war on terror cannot be won without eliminating the states like Pakistan which sponsor terrorism, are a refuge for Al Qaeda, and cannot get themselves out of the mess they've been in for 60 years, even after India lent them 650000000 Rupees to start their country. If that doesn't spell "a country that's in bad need of help from the Western world", I don't know what does!

 

Wow, I have to read more about these things.


This post received an infraction for spam

 

lol no iraq is u should watch the news more often idiot


This post received an infraction for spam

 

You heard the man

I haven't read up on this much, but I thought the US supported Musharraf, at least before he resigned. I heard he stepped down in part because of his unpopularity among the Pakistani population at his cooperation with the US war on terror. The ISI have apparently arrested over 700 Al Qaeda members, including Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

 

Mmm yeah, I say we turn the middle east into a crater, = no more recession


This post received an infraction for spam

 

Don't watch the news as much, haven't heard anything or watched anything the last couple of days.



This post received an infraction for spam

 

Just because you hate someone doesn't make him a terrorist. Nowadays people call eachother terrorists just because they want to attack them. Look at Iraq if USA never invaded it there would be no "terrorists" or in Palestina if Israel never came and took palestinian land there would never be any "terrorists". In India over 200.000 muslims had to leave their homes in 2006 because of the hindus who burnt their homes, how come you call Musharraf a terrorist but you dont think that hindus are?

 

I'm aware of that. However, Pakistan's government DID sponsor the Mumbai attacks (the gunmen confessed, and ISI is doing nothing to stop Lashkar-e-Tayiba).

So you deny the fact that the Taliban and Al-Qaeda have sanctuary in Pakistan and the Mumbai attackers came from Pakistan? This will be interesting to argue...

In 2006, those were Dalits who were attacked, not Muslims. Hindu-Musilm violence in India is about as random and unusual as... I don't know... school shootings in the Western world? The truth is that Muslims are better off in India than Hindus, Christians and Sikhs are in Pakistan.

http://www.fundforpeace.org/web/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=99&Itemid=140

 

What i was trying to say is that just because someone call you a terrorist doesn't make you a terrorist.

Here is a attack by hindus on muslims:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/sep/26/kashmir.india

And there aren't anything that proves that the attacks on Mumbai was done by Pakistan. Trust me there is no reason for the Pakistan goverment to attack India as it would cost more pakistanian lifes than indian lifes. Just because the gunmen confessed doesn't make it true. The attacks on Mumbai was done by someone smart enough to be sure that the real persons behind the attacks would be unknown and instead blame it on someone else. So it is easy for the gunmen to lie and tell that it was the pakistani goverment who sponsored them just to make people angry at Pakistan while it could be someone else.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXvETu3IQKU

About the Hindu-Muslim violence - I wish that it didn't happen, but it is random and unusual, and as I've said before, Muslims in India live better lives than non-Muslims in Pakistan.

There are more Muslims in India than there are in Pakistan, funnily enough.

 

To be honest, its not a group of people its RELIGION that fuels all this violence.

not the religion itself, but the way people themselves interpret it and act upon those interpretations.

 

According to this site: http://www.aneki.com/muslim.html there are more muslims in Pakistan than India but in an other site it said there is 135 million muslims in India.

And i dont think pakistan treats non muslims bad, i saw an english guy who had a bar and never had any trouble running it. And there is a sect in Islam called Ahmadia, neither did they have trouble practicing their religion.

I still think that pakistan is not "the axist of all terrorism".

 

I'm going by what a Delhi politician said - could be wrong, though.

Do you remember the 1971 East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) atrocities? Pakistan's army systematically executed several thousand Bengali Hindus and even Bengali Muslims when they were a part of their country.

http://www.hinduamericanfoundation.org/policy_briefs/policy_pakistan.pdf
http://www.hinduhumanrights.org/Pakistan/IndexPakistan.html
http://209.85.173.132/search?q=cach...tion+of+Hindus+in+Pakistan&cd=8&hl=en&ct=clnk

Their government is doing nothing to help with the Mumbai attacks or take care of the Taliban and Al-Qaeda being harbored in their country, so what does that make them?