9-11 Loose Change (full-version)

Discussion in 'Something For All' started by SwiftSeller, Mar 26, 2009.

9-11 Loose Change (full-version)
  1. Unread #21 - Mar 29, 2009 at 1:26 AM
  2. Benwise
    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2007
    Posts:
    5,768
    Referrals:
    6
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Benwise Hero

    9-11 Loose Change (full-version)

    Shows that you DIDN'T EVEN WATCH THE VIDEO YOU POSTED. Imbecile. In the video, an airplane crashed into a building in FRANCE, ACCIDENTLY. If you could read/watch half of the stuff you posted, you might know that. Fool. How could you misinterpret that? I said something about a MUCH OLDER BUILDING, as in MUCH OLDER than the twin towers. Seriously, watch the videos you post instead of going to make a post.

    Oh, and the foolishness again. You mentioned fireproofing the steel? The experts in the video mentioned that even WITHOUT it, it could have lasted MUCH longer without melting/breaking.
     
  3. Unread #22 - Mar 29, 2009 at 8:25 AM
  4. SwiftSeller
    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2008
    Posts:
    2,461
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    SwiftSeller Grand Master
    Banned

    9-11 Loose Change (full-version)

    are you retarded? im talking about the pentagon not france... not the towers... not anything... pentagon only....
     
  5. Unread #23 - Mar 29, 2009 at 11:02 AM
  6. Benwise
    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2007
    Posts:
    5,768
    Referrals:
    6
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Benwise Hero

    9-11 Loose Change (full-version)

    Oh, really? You're talking about the pentagon when you make refrence to the twin towers? In mh thing above, I said nothing about the Twin Towers, or the Pentagon. A seperate building was hit with a plane, and it did not fall.
     
  7. Unread #24 - Mar 29, 2009 at 11:04 AM
  8. SwiftSeller
    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2008
    Posts:
    2,461
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    SwiftSeller Grand Master
    Banned

    9-11 Loose Change (full-version)

    so what relevance does it have to 911?
     
  9. Unread #25 - Mar 30, 2009 at 11:47 AM
  10. The Disturbed
    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2007
    Posts:
    419
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    3

    The Disturbed Forum Addict

    9-11 Loose Change (full-version)

    Was it hit with a Boeing-757 going 70 MPH and was the fireproofing worn off on impact?
     
  11. Unread #26 - Mar 30, 2009 at 3:20 PM
  12. Rahul
    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2005
    Posts:
    1,023
    Referrals:
    2
    Sythe Gold:
    5

    Rahul Guru
    Banned

    9-11 Loose Change (full-version)

    Listen! Hippies and uneducated anti-government fanatics tell us that 9/11 was not possible without a bomb in the building etc. And the educated scientist and engineers prove every single time that it is very possible a plane could do that. Who the fuck are you going to listen to?...
     
  13. Unread #27 - Mar 30, 2009 at 4:03 PM
  14. SwiftSeller
    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2008
    Posts:
    2,461
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    SwiftSeller Grand Master
    Banned

    9-11 Loose Change (full-version)

    exactly.

    Look at the diagram of the pentagon. the hole is much smaller than the 757. and why doesnt the video show a plane hit, its just an explosion. why were the other tapes that caught the "plane" confiscated by the FBI and CIA. and why was there a white line on the lawn matching the same trajectory of the "plane"
     
< Drugs Addicts | The "N" Word/Racial Separation >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest


 
 
Adblock breaks this site