Tubba's Infraction Appeal for Spamming

I posted this a week or so ago, and I was not answered, so I'm posting it again.

http://sythe.org/showthread.php?p=4598849#post4598849
I was infracted by Giddy for saying that. To me, it looked like this person was trying to find out new methods. This person asked "thoughts"? So I told them my thoughts. Numerous people posted after me quoting what I said, and saying that they agreed, and that they would have posted the same thing if I hadn't of posted it first. Should I have been infracted for this?

Also, in my defense, I later posted this, to clear it up. This person should have been more specific on the question. It really did look like they were just trying to leech new methods.

(What I posted in response to that)-Then you could have phrased it that way, instead of phrasing it in a way that you were just looking for new methods. Of course there will be new methods. The question is whether people will release these methods. A decent method is using hunter and furs.

Please un-infract me if you believe that this is not worth an infraction.
Thank you for your time, mods/admins
-tubba

 

I'm assuming this dispute has already been denied before, seeing as it's in the archives, but no mods posted on it.

http://www.sythe.org/showthread.php?t=582764

Maybe we can get someone to post on this one with an answer >_>

 

You didn't post anything productive for the conversation. You just flamed him and spammed his thread.

 

Someone has already reversed it. I don't think it's spam either.