Don't believe in "Intelligent design"? Let me ask you some questions.

Question number one.

To start... someone tell me how the earth was created in their own words.


RULES!
1. No copy paste.
2. Act intelligent.

 

Dust clumped together into rocks, which clumped together into larger rocks, and so on, while spinning around the sun.

 

Where do you believe the laws of physics came from and the rules that govern our universe came from?

And everything has to start somewhere, so where did the dust come from?

 

I don't even know that the laws of physics came from somewhere. Perhaps they are an inherent property of reality.

Why must everything start somewhere?

 

The place where we live (Not the universe... The thing that holds universes and the thing that holds the thing that hold universes and so on) has no beginning, or if it did, another something created it, but something had to create the thing that created it. In my opinion where we live now has always existed and will always exist. This means that there is an infinite amount of cultures, life, and such that has happened through out time and the world we live in now has happened before an infinite amount of times and will be happening for ever for a infinite amount of times.

 

According to our reality everything is finite.

This might make sense but what about the creation of this infinite time? By creation I meen the planets and everything else.

 

What do you mean?

 

Besides the unexplainable phenomenon of creation everything has a begining and an end. We live in a society that believes that "If you can't prove it with science, it must be false." Because we are only human we have limited our thinking that the rules of science apply to everything.

 

Well clearly, God is an exception to this argument, yes?

No, we live in a society that believes "If you can't prove it with evidence (you know, the thing that we use to prove EVERYTHING ELSE), then you're wasting my time".

 

That is true but the only way people seem to prove things these days is with science.

 

Science, or evidence-based reasoning, yes. We use it for absolutely everything - you do too.

 

Planets and such were made by natural processes not understood by humans as they have no witnessed and studied these events... This universe was created by the big bang, and will expand for awhile then stop and compress then explode again, says the new theory.. The big bang sets off the fast making of planets.

The place we live was created by a much larger place. We were created in a lab of a very advanced species living in a place just like our own, just MUCH bigger. Now, how did they come to be? They were created by a much larger place's animals... The loop continues and continues. You could consider these people "God" but they had a creator, and their "God" has a creator, ect. So, if everything has a creator there must be infinite amounts of creators of everything...

 

I believe that the universe always was and has no end, our human minds are unable to comprehend infinity.

 

I believe certain rational things. Other things such as the big bang I don't.

So tell me... if you believe in a big bang then why arent there plains of random land scattered through space(looking like a five year old scribbled with a vector tool in a 3d program). With the laws of physics and everything else the big bang theory seems to fail.

 

Yggdrasil has always existed.

 

Land? The bing bang created loads of space dust and shit. A big bang would create a pattern affect, not a random affect. What looks really random for years, was a way for skeptics to try and disprove the big bang. They have now found patterns in the universe and have shown them quite well. I do not have a link, as it was from Science channel...

Seeing as the universe is expanding, and it kinda has been proven that there was a big bang, I do not understand why you say science makes the theory fail.

 

The Big Bang theory is not one describing how the universe began, it merely describes the initial stages of expansion of the universe.

http://www.toarchive.org/faqs/astronomy/bigbang.html
http://www.big-bang-theory.com/

Please, before you post arguments against mainstream science, think to yourself that perhaps somebody else has already thought of it.

 

lol what else can you prove it with? imagination? story-telling?

 

Imagination and storytelling equal science.

 

The Earth was created by dust particles and random clumps of matter (rock) orbiting one another due to everything down to the atomic level having its own gravitational pull. It's like throwing a bunch of magnets on the ground; if they happen to be within one anothers magnetic fields, they'll cluster together.

According to the first law of thermodynamics, energy and matte cannot be created nor destroyed, only transferred or transformed. This makes quarks and gluons (the main proponents of physical existence) infinite.

Ever heard of asteroids, meteorites and stars, etcetera?