Rape-X Anti-Rape Female-Condom

Discussion in 'Something For All' started by xestrox, Nov 24, 2008.

?

do you agree with this product being released?

  1. yes.

    46 vote(s)
    40.7%
  2. no.

    67 vote(s)
    59.3%
Rape-X Anti-Rape Female-Condom
  1. Unread #161 - Dec 4, 2008 at 10:22 PM
  2. DropKick Murphys
    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2007
    Posts:
    1,837
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    DropKick Murphys Guru

    Rape-X Anti-Rape Female-Condom

    Releasing a gun can potentially be handing women an opportunity to harm an innocent male. So what? Get over it, honestly.
    I could care less about the pro's and con's of the device. Why will you deny somebody the right to sell a product? And don't say something barely intelligible in awful grammar about how it could hurt innocent men like you normally do, thanks. Practically anything can be used to harm innocents.
     
  3. Unread #162 - Dec 4, 2008 at 10:22 PM
  4. Shredderbeam
    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Posts:
    8,579
    Referrals:
    15
    Sythe Gold:
    664

    Shredderbeam Hero

    Rape-X Anti-Rape Female-Condom

    You're looking at this the wrong way. The individual is responsible for their own misdeeds. By forbidding innocents to purchase and use this device, you exert control over them. If you can decide what others can/cannot use, why can't I do the same to you? Why can I not march into your home and decide what you are allowed to have? To spare you the trouble, the answer is that you have a right to your own body, and a right to do as you will without fear of coercion. However, you are trying to violate this right of others, which is unacceptable.
     
  5. Unread #163 - Dec 4, 2008 at 11:08 PM
  6. The Riddler_
    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2008
    Posts:
    2,779
    Referrals:
    3
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    The Riddler_ Grand Master
    Banned

    Rape-X Anti-Rape Female-Condom

    The effects of the device are not permenant, it will give you a very sharp pain, but will not make your penis disfuntion or "rip it off".

    So if the woman abuses it, she may pay a large some of compensation to the accidental victim of the item.
     
  7. Unread #164 - Dec 4, 2008 at 11:10 PM
  8. xestrox
    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Posts:
    312
    Referrals:
    2
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    xestrox Forum Addict
    Banned

    Rape-X Anti-Rape Female-Condom

    as you said you dont care about the pros and cons, showing you are not considering both sides of the debate you are sticking with your first impression of the topic, second of all a gun can also in many cases be used for survival, hunting, and protection, UNLIKE THIS DEVICE, because as ive stated several times, it will have little, if any, positive uses, if you would like to see why the positive intentions of this device become useless please read my previous posts.
     
  9. Unread #165 - Dec 4, 2008 at 11:12 PM
  10. Shredderbeam
    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Posts:
    8,579
    Referrals:
    15
    Sythe Gold:
    664

    Shredderbeam Hero

    Rape-X Anti-Rape Female-Condom

    The uses of the device are irrelevant. Your attempt to prevent people from owning it is a violation of their rights.
     
  11. Unread #166 - Dec 4, 2008 at 11:14 PM
  12. xestrox
    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Posts:
    312
    Referrals:
    2
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    xestrox Forum Addict
    Banned

    Rape-X Anti-Rape Female-Condom

    Do you feel any individual should be allowed to possess mustard gas, or other chemical weapons or Bio Weapons? seeing as your stating it's anyones rights,
     
  13. Unread #167 - Dec 4, 2008 at 11:20 PM
  14. Shredderbeam
    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Posts:
    8,579
    Referrals:
    15
    Sythe Gold:
    664

    Shredderbeam Hero

    Rape-X Anti-Rape Female-Condom

    Yes, if they're willing to invest their own resources into it.

    I've already discussed the threat of nuclear weapons in this post: http://www.sythe.org/showpost.php?p=4056074&postcount=60

    Yet, this device is not comparable to any sort of weapon of mass destruction. It cannot be used on a large number of people (or anybody) against their will.
     
  15. Unread #168 - Dec 5, 2008 at 12:42 AM
  16. EnlightenMe
    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2008
    Posts:
    877
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    EnlightenMe The Swimmer
    Banned

    Rape-X Anti-Rape Female-Condom

    I think it should be released. If people are not happy with this product their is a easy solution, DONT USE IT, I mean cmon people, its up to that person wether they want to use this or not. Also I believe that with this advance we could have even simpilar products in use in the future. Just a suggestion, but I believe this product has no problem with being released
     
  17. Unread #169 - Dec 5, 2008 at 1:47 AM
  18. Supa_Ramga
    Joined:
    May 22, 2008
    Posts:
    223
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Supa_Ramga Active Member

    Rape-X Anti-Rape Female-Condom

    I disagree.

    Laws are made to protect us from ourselves. We cannot ignore the potential to abuse a device.

    You're arguing that one should not be allowed to limit another's personal freedom. But do not forget, your own personal freedom ends where mine begins.

    The device can be seen as a "danger to society." This is a legitimate claim that questions the safety of the device. The safety of the public is FAR more important that one's own desires. This is why we have concealed weapons laws.

    We cannot be selfish in determining our own freedoms.
     
  19. Unread #170 - Dec 5, 2008 at 1:47 AM
  20. CruZr
    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Posts:
    969
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    CruZr Apprentice
    Banned

    Rape-X Anti-Rape Female-Condom

    HOLY FUCKING GOD, if you have a paranoid girlfriend (80% of women), then what if they forget it's in them?
    Yeah, I wouldn't go NEAR a women that paranoid and psycho that has a device stuffed up her crotch that slices up dick.
     
  21. Unread #171 - Dec 5, 2008 at 6:26 AM
  22. Shredderbeam
    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Posts:
    8,579
    Referrals:
    15
    Sythe Gold:
    664

    Shredderbeam Hero

    Rape-X Anti-Rape Female-Condom

    Right, I am not allowed to actively seek you out and violate your rights. Ownership of this device does not do that.

    How do you view this as a danger to society?
     
  23. Unread #172 - Dec 5, 2008 at 6:36 AM
  24. Epic God
    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2008
    Posts:
    511
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Epic God Forum Addict
    Banned

    Rape-X Anti-Rape Female-Condom

    tbh i dont think a woman would want to walk around with something up her virg.
     
  25. Unread #173 - Dec 5, 2008 at 11:20 AM
  26. sirfartsalot
    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Posts:
    290
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    sirfartsalot Forum Addict
    Banned

    Rape-X Anti-Rape Female-Condom

    wow this is redicoulse why should women have to be afraid of getting raped they should have these devices
     
  27. Unread #174 - Dec 5, 2008 at 4:51 PM
  28. xestrox
    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Posts:
    312
    Referrals:
    2
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    xestrox Forum Addict
    Banned

    Rape-X Anti-Rape Female-Condom

    I feel that is irrational, saying anything should be allowed to be released to public even chemical weapons or nuclear bombs, let alone a device that helps increase pleasure when raping a child (as we discussed before on this thread and you supported anything being released) this reply you had shows no sense.
     
  29. Unread #175 - Dec 5, 2008 at 6:46 PM
  30. Supa_Ramga
    Joined:
    May 22, 2008
    Posts:
    223
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Supa_Ramga Active Member

    Rape-X Anti-Rape Female-Condom

    It is a concealed weapon that can severely harm others. Unless the weapon was in plain sight, so everyone was aware of it's existence, it is dangerous. This obviously cannot be done. The weapon can be used maliciously and therefore laws must exist to prevent those malicious uses. It is a danger to society.
     
  31. Unread #176 - Dec 5, 2008 at 7:02 PM
  32. The Riddler_
    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2008
    Posts:
    2,779
    Referrals:
    3
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    The Riddler_ Grand Master
    Banned

    Rape-X Anti-Rape Female-Condom

    Must I repeat myself? Also, then what is your opinion on a CCP?
     
  33. Unread #177 - Dec 5, 2008 at 7:07 PM
  34. xestrox
    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Posts:
    312
    Referrals:
    2
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    xestrox Forum Addict
    Banned

    Rape-X Anti-Rape Female-Condom

    Before you post quoting matthews post, you should read around about this product for yourself, or try reading about FemDefence, the version that practically rips the penis up and does cause permanent damage.
     
  35. Unread #178 - Dec 5, 2008 at 7:11 PM
  36. Supa_Ramga
    Joined:
    May 22, 2008
    Posts:
    223
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Supa_Ramga Active Member

    Rape-X Anti-Rape Female-Condom

    You fail to notice my point... It still CAUSES damage. And as you say, a great deal of it for that matter. It is not in plain view, it is a CONCEALED WEAPON. It can be abused and used maliciously. It is a danger to society and should be treated as such with our concealed weapon laws.

    I too dislike it when people don't read my posts before posting...
     
  37. Unread #179 - Dec 5, 2008 at 7:21 PM
  38. The Riddler_
    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2008
    Posts:
    2,779
    Referrals:
    3
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    The Riddler_ Grand Master
    Banned

    Rape-X Anti-Rape Female-Condom

    Umm, I did read your post. And basically anyone can use it for malicious reasons, but even if they do, you can sue them. And I doubt they would like that.

    Also, i mean its probably the same pain as getting kicked in the nutz very hard.
    FemDefence and Rape-X are 2 different products. And I did read it for my self, I posted days earlier before you guys did between pages 6-8. I just repost his posts so people can read about the product and not go on their horrible resources (their brains) to make their opinions.
     
  39. Unread #180 - Dec 5, 2008 at 7:34 PM
  40. xestrox
    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Posts:
    312
    Referrals:
    2
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    xestrox Forum Addict
    Banned

    Rape-X Anti-Rape Female-Condom


    i feel as you said you doubt they would like being sued is irrelevent, seeing as people dont really consider the chance of being sued into there actions before they make an impulsive decision, also if you read all of the previous posts of matthew, he states how it does cause damage, sure it may be healable damage that can be treated and fixed, but a scar will not be fixed, that would be embarrassing to have a girl go to preform oral sex on you and see you have 7+ scars of holes where the hooks had punctured you.
     
< Surgery | Is School a Joke? >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest


 
 
Adblock breaks this site