Rape-X Anti-Rape Female-Condom

Still, at least it reduces the risk of pregnancy through rape as well as maybe catch the careless rapist. And maybe another device will be invented for the ass, rofl. Plug up both holes :O

As Shredder said, at least you understand ^_^

Why do you think the success rate will be low?

It's tough not to feel something in your vagina...And anyways, it's not meant to stay in at all times. It's basically meant to be kept near the woman, because it takes about 10 seconds to insert. As soon as she feels there may be some threat, she could insert it.

The rapist can't remove it without the special applicator. The Rapex is not clearly visible at all, especially after the rapists adrenaline kicks in. You can't manually remove it, you need to use the special applicator to put it in AND take it out.

 

but by the time the woman is punished the guy has his dick in 4 pieces and is "unmanned" forever

 

Mhmm because I'm sure you did your research on the RAPEX in detail. God damnit. What part of *NO FUCKING PERMANENT DAMAGE* do you not fucking understand? He can still have sex. He can still have kids. He can still do EVERYTHING he could do before, but I'll tell you one thing - he'll sure as hell think before raping [or having drunken sex, for that matter] again.

 

I didn't notice the "non permanent side effects" But I still don't see how all of this can add up.

-Non permanent damages
-Still prevent rape
-Leaves the women to safety after "Deployment"
-Doesn't hurt the women while it's inside her
-Isn't visible (not noticeable from close up)
-Won't malfunction

It is impossible to meet most of the standards at the same time, which makes me draw the conclusion that it is not usable to the users likeliness of it's thought of it's effective.

Also, people need to read before they post, 60% of this thread is just re-posted.

 

-Non permanent damages: The device uses "hooks" that grab onto the penis, but do not go deep enough to affect anything that affects function. It HURTS A LOT, but it doesn't cause any structural or functional damage - just slight discoloration.

-Still prevent rape: It may not prevent rape entirely, but it would at least take some careless rapists off the street - and just give the woman a feeling of safety and security when she's home alone. If you knew, as a potential rapist, that the woman may have something in her vagina that would hurt your penis A LOT and you couldn't remove it yourself, wouldn't you think twice?

-Leaves the women to safety after "Deployment": The man's penis is grabbed by this device, and the immense pain he feels overtakes the "rationality" receptors which would cause him to further hurt the woman. He has to try to quell the pain, and naturally the way one would expect to do this is by removing the device - he will soon realize this is an impossible task, but the victim will be long gone and he will be apprehended because of the device.

-Doesn't hurt the women while it's inside her: The design can be found on the website: www.Rapestop.net. They have quite a good answer to this piece of criticism, basically saying that it's how the device functions that prevents accidental injury from happening. It has been tested.

-Isn't visible (not noticeable from close up): Absolutely not! It fits behind the labia and has no strings or anything protruding [taken from Rapestop.net FAQ]. You can't see behind the labia

-Won't malfunction: Of course, any product has the risk of malfunctioning. However, the harm done by these malfunctions shouldn't be a reason for the women not to be able to purchase them. It's all about risk vs. reward, and according to the products' creators, there is quite little risk with quite a high reward.

I hope these answers helped I mean obviously, there will be some drawbacks at first. Eventually, however, this product might become more and more developed until [ideally, but impractically] it is finally able to stop rape entirely, while not harming innocent people.

And yes, I totally agree that people need to read the thread before posting

 

Well, I've already voted in the poll but if you would have stated the things you said in previously, I would have voted, but meh, It's just an internet vote.

And you didn't point out almost any of the things that you said in the above post, especially the design of it in the site. And it also seems to me that you have ALOT more knowledge of the product than it is described in the Wikipedia post. So i just concluded from the information that was shown =/.

 

its fucked even thinking bout this sheit.

 

WOW!! I cant believe they are actually considering this!! Im pretty sure that would cause a shit load of law suits..

 

This should not be permitted because a woman can intentionally do this just to get revenge on someone. That would be the same as a man adding blades to his penis when he's having sex...

Maybe instead of a freaking shredder make it just shock it? Idk, lol.

 

Alright I could see that on the market then you have those Really Fucked up girls who arent really raped they just wanna hurt a man XD

 

Well, I agree with you that at the moment, the product is very crude. But basically, the motto can be thought of as "No means NO" -- and yes, while a man could add blades to his penis, you should consider the likelihood of him getting raped vs. the likelihood of the woman getting raped. I agree that there could be some crazy women who use it just to get revenge, but it's the same way with almost anything! You can harm people using nearly everything you use on a daily basis, most of which doesn't have as high of a potential upside. The product is being modified and upgraded quite often to increase the productivity and decrease the risk of accidental injuries. But keep in mind that NOTHING is given to the man except second thoughts and a bit of temporary pain.

Oh I understand it's just an internet poll and it's not going to change anything, but it's still fun to have a debate on the subject. I definitely think the first post should be edited to Rapestop.net, because the Wikipedia article is a bit lacking.

So, should we forbid baseball bats because of that story where the child was beaten to death by his mother with a baseball bat? Should we forbid knives, since people can stab people and kill them? With any product on the market (practically), there is *some* risk involved. But remember, this product CAN NOT be deadly - it only causes temporary pain.

 

Oh, perhaps I was phrasing it incorrectly, then.

Yes, do let's.

Even if that was the effect of the device, it would be no different to a thief being shot for house invasion.

 

since i disagree against corporal punishment, i don't believe in something like this. But then again, it's not only because of that. firstly, if someone realises a woman is wearing it, he could remove it, using some kind of force, causing substantial pain and/or damage to the woman, without going into detail.

 

By all means, release it. Serves the guy right for trying to force himself on a girl.

Let's just hope that the females that would be using it are somewhat intelligent. I would feel bad if the girl forgot it was in and tried to sex up her boyfriend. poor guy...

 

Release it? Damn straight!

But I would strongly advise NOT having sex with a drunk/forgetful woman =P.

 

Well, the device wouldn't help the woman one bit. Think about it, if your dick gets shredded into 400 pieces by one of these things, you aren't going to let the bitch live.

 

Who says the man is the drunk one, maybe the women is the only one drinking, and is even possible that the man isn't aware that the girl is drinking, aswell as if the women is on any sort of medication that may cause her to forget that it is there.

Also if you have done your research, you will come to find that it will cause permanent damage if the man does not recieve medical attention for it, meaning sure that would force a rapist to turn himself in, seeing as he would have to go to the hospital to get it removed, exposing the crime he has committed, yet what about the poor americans (seeing as this will most likely be more popular in poor ghetto areas since rape occurs more commonly there) the poor people are supposed to be able to afford the treatment required for this?

 

1) Okay, so now you're defending a rapist. And the rapist can make a choice - his penis or punishment for the crime he commited. Isn't the whole purpose of laws and punishments to make people face the consequences for their actions?
2) There is a plan for mandatory health and medical insurance across the US. Anyways, if the woman is at fault - she can be forced to pay the bills.
3) If the man is sober and the woman is drunk, it is by definition "rape" -- a drunk woman cannot give rational consent anyways [according to the law].

 

xestrox, so what?
So what if all that happens? What right do you claim to have that allows you to tell other people what they can do with their bodies?

 

Wow. I saw something about this but I never realized it took a part of the penis off.

If it's noticeable enough for someone to think twice before they stick it in, then I feel it's a great idea.

The problem is if it's abused and used as a weapon instead of correctly which is a tool to protect the woman from rape.

I assume that if the "female condom" is noticeable, the rapist could remove it himself or force her to remove it so then who does it protect?

Regardless, they need to come up with other forms of anti rape than this. It seems to be cruel and usual as equal as rape is. It doesn't seem to help more than it has potential to hurt.