Scar and RSBot

Reading this thread's posts will give you general idea on how each cheating program works. It will help you decide which is best suited for your use.

Which one is better: Scar or RSBot?*

Please post why you prefer one and if you can, list it's pro's and con's.


Do not give lame comments such as, "SCAR OWNS RSBOT", "RSBOT FTW", or anything along those lines.

If you are going to choose a side, state why.

It doesn't matter which one you choose.
You will not get flamed for your choice as long as you state why you chose it.


*This is a public poll, other members can see what you voted for.

 

There isn't one better than the other. You can't compare them. For scar you need alot of things which makes it "user unfriendly'' and RSBot is alot easier to use. But there are more (diffrient) scripts for Scar than RSBot has. I prefer scar but you can both try them out to see the diffrience.

 

From what i've read, SCAR is more flexible, and can be applied to a range of games. I've seen people in the SRL forums saying that RSBot is used to obtain numbers to use reflection with, although it's frowned upon to create a script out of SMART and reflection since it takes out the hard work and is apparently more likely to fail. And SMART has been foiled by Runescape, now the 'canvas' that the game is drawn on refreshes itself and redraws, making SMART go out of focus and unable to auto.

Otherwise, I have no experience with RSBot. I could have sworn it was used by Chinese gold farmers.

 

SCAR OWNS RSBOT!


Just wanted to say that

For a real answer:

RSBot reads the client and edits the information that it gathers and that is how it works. This is more detectable by Runescape but it also makes things a lot easier and possibly faster than SRL/SCAR can do (with a color-based script). RSBot is used for single players and has a smaller community, which relates to fewer scripts. But they are mostly good scripts. RSBot is pretty concise in ways of how to do things. Everything is pretty much the same, FindObject, FindNPC, Findetc... and you can't customize how to find things unless you know java pretty well and know the in and outs of how RSBot works (for the most part).

SRL/SCAR is the better of the 2 in my opinion. Scar is color-based so it takes more work to get something done compared to RSBot where it is FindNPC(name); and your done. SRL though is directed towards an 'army' even though plenty of people use it now for single players since the new trade updates this past year. You can add a lot more customizable things in SRL to where you can change how things are found or done. SRL now has SMART which allows your mouse to be free and you can do other things on your computer. SMART now has reflection also, which can make it finds thing as fast as RSBot (though color-based scripting is now advanced enough where we can find things by color just as fast too). Which is closely like RSBot and how that works. The difference though is RSBot edits the client (which makes it detectable) while SMART uses reflection which just reads the client and does NO editing of it at all, thus makes it undetectable.

Now you can get banned using both of these but you will get banned a lot more and a lot quicker using RSBot.

Just make sure for both you don't abuse the power of autoing, unless you are prepared to get banned. Ex: Don't auto 8hr+ a day if you want the character to not get blackmarks. Auto maybe 2-4 hours a day and try to play legit some (if you care about the character).


Hope that helps. I can elaborate on mostly any questions you have just let me know.

Nope. RSBot is a new bot made by Speljohan and Quarters (I believe it was Quarters). The bot you are thinking of is RSDaemon ( I believe is how it was spelt ). It was the bot you seen all the autoing woodcutters using. It could auto up-to 80 players at one time, on one bot. It was a machine.

 

There is a better one in my opinion.

Now for starters.

Cons of SCAR:
- A little more advanced (making it more powerful if you know what to do)
- Too many people against it (they dont know how to use)
- People think it is dead (it's really not...)
- Need's 2 plug-ins for it to read / be minimizeable (big deal...)

Cons of RSBot:
- Laggy
- Uses to much memory
- Made for Kids\Noob coders.
- Edits the client (client hacking = ban)
- Goes down alot more.
- For RuneScape ONLY
- Detetcable more than SCAR

Pros of SCAR:
- Updated regularly.
- Bigger community (...rsbot might be a tad bigger now)
- More Scripts (total, all scar scripts combined)
- For any game. (though made with runescape in mind)
- SRL (More Humanlike + Helpful functions)
- SMART (Minimizeability)
- Reflection (READS (not edits) the client... so undetecable)
- Undetectable (with a good script)
- Built in tools to help with your scripting (FORMS, DTMS, BitMaps, etc)
- Can run many autos at once.

Pros of RSBot:
- Easier to code.
- A little bit easier to update urself (you MUST know what you are doing)
- Minimizeable


Websites:

www.srl-forums.com [SCAR]
www.freddy1990.com [SCAR]

I dont know any rsbot sites... sorry

 

Scar is the one i would prefer.
My reasons are:
Sythe is free.
Sythe is "unfriendly" to new users so you should go to SRL forums and read a thread on how to use it.


Rsbot is not the one to go with.
My reasons are:
NOT FREE

The end xD

 

Lol non of you know what rsbot does

It does NOT edit the client! it just gets the id's from it and moves the "mouse" to those id's

RSbot is better imo but haven't used scar for ages so cant really say
easier to code = more scripts it also makes easier to make more advanced things happen, never laggs with me, my pc can handle it so i dont mind using resources

 

Rsbot does not reflect the client.

please learn about what you talk about before you post.

 

RSBot is TOTALLY FREE. It is even open sourced. And why are you talking about sythe?

Please know what your talking about before making yourself look like an idiot. Ask speljohan yourself, it edits the client, it doesn't reflect it that is what SMART does for SCAR/SRL.

I'm pretty sure I know what RSBot does .

 

Great answers so far.
Keep them coming; I would like to learn more in depth about these programs.

 

Well Pretty much. RSBot is meant for just runescape, so it is limited. SCAR is for anything. so you can do more. (people make plugins for scar... making it better for runescape than rsbot)

 

Scar and RSbot are cloes..

Scar is very hard to use to a newby, But is very good when it comes to scripts.

Rsbot is very easy to use and can be minimized, but is detectable.

My answer:

For the moment, scar... Rsbot tbh is better then scar, but its detectable.

Wait for rsbot v2, then it will kick

 

u do not know what u r talking about. scar is minimizeable. and reflects the client.

giving it everything rsbot has plus scars function an undetectability. scar was minimizeable before rsbot existed

 

To add a poll, Click Thread Tools then Add Poll.

 

If SCAR is minimized, how detectable is it? Or does it not make a difference whether it's minimized or not?
Also, what does "reflects the client" mean?

Thank you.

 

When SCAR is minimized it is equally as undetecable as it is, non-minimized.

"reflecting" the client is where SMART reads the client, then takes the information, and converts it into coordinates on the screen. Think of it like... "reading, then answering".

 

I have a feeling this poll is a little biased but I may be wrong. Because this is a public poll, people might want to "fit in" so they will choose SCAR since most people are choosing SCAR so far and the more respected members of Sythe are also choosing SCAR.

e.g. Macroman, Jethr0x, etc...

I think I should've made this poll private.

 

If you want a good answere you shouldn't have posted it in the scar forum... Only scar users read it...

 

Apparently, I can't post anything related to rsbot in the rs cheating section.

 

I don't think it is biased. It all depends on what you want to know. Is there something more specific you are looking for? If so let us know so we can answer it.

Pretty much everything layed out between the two bots are here and are pretty accurate.