100% default PS - Space sig

All defaults

 

yes it is all defaults, except the space background which isn't.

 

THe texture on the planets aren't all defaults either, cool fag.

 

Oh yes. 100% PS defaults

 

Sorry The True Gears, he has a point, consider this a warning, claiming any more work as your own will be an insta-ban.

 

T_T this is seriously my work...Ask Viper he was the one who gave me the tutorials as I made it all, then I put it all together from the feild of stars I made, then the planet.
Only part not mine is the texture used to make the planets

 

Yes, it's a tutorial result, but you claim to have made it yourself, then how are the lens flare stars in exactly the same position?

 

Omg are you serious? they're not in the same position, also its wider than the picture you posted. I could see how you would think that it was taken from the tutorial itself, But its not.

 

lolol

 

its a nice sig lol

 

Haha.

It's resized you fool. It's clear and plain for anyone to see, the larger stars are in the same position related to each other.

 

Can anyone say Fail?

 

It looks to me like a very closely followed tutorial result. Remember, try to put your on spin on a tut. It looks good though, I'd love to see the tut .

 

good sig even tho it might be ripped >.<

 

LOL at this garbage.

 

Regardless of what anyone else said here - in the event you made this yourself, following the tutorial:

1. Your border and text are out of place. Try applying the same effects to the text as you have with the stars for a more fluent result.

If you must put a border on this work, why not try something innovative, like a porthole on a spaceship, or the surface of a planet you are standing on?

2. Your planets don't vary much from the tutorial. I'm almost certain that if the tutorial wasn't from artofgregmartin.com, you got a ripped tutorial based on that one. To make something look authentic, you have to vary from the 'realistic' tutorial to reach the 'real' art.

Also note that your two planets have the exact same surface. In reality, that would never happen.

Your texture is also a bit off, considering that a planet with such a thin atmosphere would have been hit by a meteor or two million in it's lifetime, leaving craters, not gashes in the planet's surface.

3. The lighting on the planets does not reflect the light source (presumably the 3 nearby white dwarf stars.) They all look like they would be in range for these two planets to be revolving around the stars, which would make those stars the dominate source of light, not some star in the top-left, off of the image.

 

Great C&C from a great artist. Thanks