Suggestion : Infractions

Discussion in 'Denied Suggestions' started by Shin, Oct 26, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Suggestion : Infractions
  1. Unread #1 - Oct 26, 2008 at 12:18 AM
  2. Shin
    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2007
    Posts:
    14,172
    Referrals:
    23
    Sythe Gold:
    197
    Discord Unique ID:
    777373911821713408
    Pool Shark (4) Village Drunk <3 n4n0 (29) Battleship Champion

    Shin Join the Sythe.org Discord
    Retired Administrator Legendary Mudkips $100 USD Donor

    Suggestion : Infractions

    Suggestion Topic : Scamming
    Issue : Infractions


    Hello, Sythe.

    Here is a new proposal I believe should be made.

    ------------------------------------------------------------

    Scamming

    As we all know, scamming continuously happens day after day. This scamming seems to be quite repetitive and relies on all of the Mods / Admins to deal with the scammers who exist.

    Mods / Admins do not work on Sythe for money, but merely work on their own time for free, offering their beloved service unto you.

    However, people seem to abuse the time of the Staff.

    WHAT DO YOU MEAN ABUSE THEIR TIME?

    I mean, I see a lot of scammer threads who don't even have any evidence of scamming. The report is just useless and the user has not even read the Rules on the Sticky.

    Quite annoying, eh?

    For this, the one who has reported should receive 1-2 Infraction Points, in my opinion.

    ------------------------------------------------------------

    Also, I believe Infraction Points should be given to those whom have been scammed.

    When a User on Sythe is banned for scamming, the person who has been scammed should receive 1 Infraction Point as well.

    I believe this because the person had neglected the use of a MM, or did not attempt to be more intelligent in their transaction to repel scamming. As a result, the person was scammed. In this, the one who had been scammed is only promoting more and more scamming.

    If those who are scammed are infracted, people may be more thoughtful of using a MM for all transactions.

    ------------------------------------------------------------

    Post your thoughts / opinions here, and they must be supported with a thorough belief.
     
  3. Unread #2 - Oct 26, 2008 at 12:36 AM
  4. jebadiah the wise man
    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2008
    Posts:
    1,341
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    jebadiah the wise man Guru

    Suggestion : Infractions

    That made me laugh, thanks. ^^

    I agree with Finn though, and isn't the loss of whatever was stolen from them enough?
     
  5. Unread #3 - Oct 26, 2008 at 12:46 AM
  6. Shallow
    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2008
    Posts:
    156
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Shallow Active Member

    Suggestion : Infractions

    This is a stupid idea. Why infract people who've been scammed?
     
  7. Unread #4 - Oct 26, 2008 at 1:06 AM
  8. TJ
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Posts:
    5,920
    Referrals:
    4
    Sythe Gold:
    40

    TJ Hero

    Suggestion : Infractions

    And people think my idea for scamming is idiotic.

    Why punish those who get scammed? Thats just a bit..ridiculous
     
  9. Unread #5 - Oct 28, 2008 at 9:50 AM
  10. SuF
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2007
    Posts:
    14,212
    Referrals:
    28
    Sythe Gold:
    1,234
    Discord Unique ID:
    203283096668340224
    <3 n4n0 Two Factor Authentication User Community Participant Spam Forum Participant Sythe's 10th Anniversary

    SuF Legend
    Pirate Retired Global Moderator

    Suggestion : Infractions

    My health book says, "Rape is always the attackers fault." which means "Scamming is always the scammers fault."....
     
  11. Unread #6 - Oct 28, 2008 at 10:16 AM
  12. FacelessVoid
    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Posts:
    1,886
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    FacelessVoid Guru
    Banned

    Suggestion : Infractions

    Wahaha, lets imprison them for a month so they can be:idea: raped again in prison.
     
  13. Unread #7 - Oct 28, 2008 at 1:42 PM
  14. Clank
    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2008
    Posts:
    1,608
    Referrals:
    2
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Clank Guru
    Banned

    Suggestion : Infractions

    Idiot.

    Thats doing a double take. Anyway, that means MORE time for the staff, to read, delete, then infract.
     
  15. Unread #8 - Oct 29, 2008 at 1:27 AM
  16. Matthew
    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2005
    Posts:
    5,153
    Referrals:
    42
    Sythe Gold:
    5,377
    Wait, do you not have an Archer rank? (5) Doge (3) Smashing Why is there BACON in the SOAP!? Literally nothing I saw Matthew Live Free or Die (3) Cool Kid (6) Poképedia Homosex (4)

    Matthew Probably breaking stuff

    Suggestion : Infractions

    Ugh just no.... This is just horrible.
     
< My Suggestion | eliminate vouches given for the following: >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.


 
 
Adblock breaks this site