Nature vs. Nurture

Discussion in 'Something For All' started by jebckr, Aug 31, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Nature vs. Nurture
  1. Unread #1 - Aug 31, 2008 at 1:29 AM
  2. jebckr
    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Posts:
    1,250
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    jebckr Guru
    Banned

    Nature vs. Nurture

    The classic debate of whethere psycological characteristics are biologically innate or acquired through education, experiance, and culture.

    Edit: Basically, are human characteristics (i.e. the way we act) given to us the day we are born or are they learned through our raising in the world.
     
  3. Unread #2 - Sep 8, 2008 at 10:02 AM
  4. draggin pure
    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2008
    Posts:
    1,429
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    draggin pure Guru
    Banned

    Nature vs. Nurture

    can you reword this for the majority of sythe...

    I don't believe 14-16 year old's will understand what you're saying..
     
  5. Unread #3 - Sep 8, 2008 at 2:06 PM
  6. The Fat Controller
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    Posts:
    1,003
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    1

    The Fat Controller Guru

    Nature vs. Nurture

    The answer is obvious, it's both. To what degree each factor has an influence depends on the specific characteristic we're talking about.
     
  7. Unread #4 - Sep 8, 2008 at 2:37 PM
  8. jebckr
    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Posts:
    1,250
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    jebckr Guru
    Banned

    Nature vs. Nurture

    An interesting theory I heard today that relates to the subject is if a human who believed cloning was morally wrong, were to be cloned; what would the clones thoughts of being a clone be?
     
  9. Unread #5 - Sep 8, 2008 at 3:53 PM
  10. squidge
    Joined:
    May 25, 2007
    Posts:
    826
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    4

    squidge Apprentice

    Nature vs. Nurture

    I'm 13. I understand it.

    Maybe, it's YOU who cant understand it.

    On topic: I think that you are born with certain paths to follow. You either nurture them or let them die. I mean, there are just some people who have a knack for things like sport or drawing. On the contrary there are those people who just suck hard at things. There's always room for improvement but for some things you just don't have the ability.

    It could also depend on the kind of activities and the friends you make in primary/elementary school. You get used to doing something when you're young and you suddenly have a knack for certain things.

    That depends on the way the clone was made. Going back to what I said before, It probably depends on the first thing he hears. Although I doubt people's opinion are passes on to their children, so why clones? Do you think you being born is morally wrong?
     
  11. Unread #6 - Sep 8, 2008 at 10:17 PM
  12. jebckr
    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Posts:
    1,250
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    jebckr Guru
    Banned

    Nature vs. Nurture

    I say clones because hypotheticaly, a clone will be genetically identical to the person they came from. So, will the person's negative outlook on cloning be the same with the clone? If so, you side with the idea of "nature"; if you think the clone's judgement would be derived by the people who raise him/her then you're siding with the idea of "nurture".
     
  13. Unread #7 - Sep 9, 2008 at 2:34 AM
  14. FattBoy008
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2008
    Posts:
    379
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    FattBoy008 Forum Addict

    Nature vs. Nurture

    I am also 13 and i do understand it.

    We done some work on this, it really does depend on the situation.

    I believe that they should not clone any animal, including the human race.
    Let nature on control the world, Humans are bound to make a mistake.
     
< Gay/Fag/Homo ~ Is it an insult? | What's Beyond Space? >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.


 
 
Adblock breaks this site