Hydra bets plagiarism

scammer profile: @jacco96

Guess what, a nother idiot who thinks it's ok to copy others thread layouts

Discussed this with @Jason first:


So here I am


I also nicely contacted the owner, then went in the discord and asked there where 2 admins would say they'd look after it and then I got this lovely response of them basicly wanting this report (aka wasting people's time)

 

Hey,
let me start off with saying that, if Sythe staff considers the GFX work of @Replica GK Owner plagiarism, I will take it down without a hassle, however I don't consider this plagiarism and I am not the only one.

As seen in the following picture, Sythes own admin @video doesn't agree with @Mots as regards this accusation.
The two pictures differentiate enough from each other to not consider this plagiarism.

Screenshot - 77bf93c26fccc653cf5cccd4678ad8c5 - Gyazo

I have seen a report from @Mots before regarding plagiarism, but I think this is the 2nd time he confuses plagiarism with inspiration.

Look at the following cases:

Screenshot - c494e7dd1db7db1d089255812aa4a503 - Gyazo
Screenshot - 7e0e4e24340fc0bbf61ee08a854b2bd8 - Gyazo
Screenshot - c9372ae3804a07ce28a8b6c8fb4c3a08 - Gyazo

The screenshots above are 3 cases of people claiming it to be plagiarism, but got denied.
Every single case has way more similarities then this does.

For the reasons above I told Mots to make a report, as I don't agree with his accusation.

I'm looking forward to the response from the Sythe staff, once again, if they look at this to be plagiarism I will take down the picture.

One last thing directed at you personally Mots, the way you went into this, making accusations in a public lobby shows that you're a pretty sad person altogether, also calling someone an idiot when they don't agree with you on something shows how much of a child you are.

- Haan

 

In addition to my previous post:

The definition of plagiarism according to Google:

"The practice of taking someone else's work or ideas and passing them off as one's own."

This is completely out of the question, I even want to go as far as saying that the dispute against the GFX work of @Rune Gold wasn't supposed to be won by Mots.

 

I didn't want to post again because it's plain as simple and we should just wait on the decision of the mods/admins to take a look at this.

First of all:

Spoiler: important

Secondly:
I appreciate how you throw your GFX designer under the bus because now it does fall under graphics marketplace rules @video , unlike the previous report.

Thirdly:

I understand a person like you needs to use google to help prove a point in your case but actually end up helping me?

Spoiler: smart

Fourthly:
The decision has been made on the runegold case and ruled in my favor as it should and was mutually agreed to by every single person that discussed this issue was discussed with, you don't have the right and clearly not the brains to second that decision.

Fifth:
You guys just copied my design, asked an admin in vage words that you "copied the design/idea" and that one admin agreed. Luckily there are more people involved in rulings and other people will also look over this.


I'd appreciate if you would stop posting on this thread unless you have actual good input and not something you just googled quickly and thought it would help in this case so the mods/admins can resolve this issue.

 

In regards to your remark about me mentioning our GFX designer:

He didn't commit plagiarism he used a public image as a template, should he have asked you first? Possibly, yes, but going as far as making a Sythe report on plagiarism really shows you are a very simple minded human being, also you are tagging Video who already said that he doesn't agree with your accusation (see the first screenshot in my initial response), so good luck on that.

The definition of "plagiarism" shows you are not in the right, neither in this case, nor the case you had against RuneGold. It doesn't help you whatsoever, but keep telling yourself that, whatever helps you sleep at night son.

I am, and with me everyone, entitled to my own opinion to question whether I agree or disagree with the decision made. Who are you to take away that right? Man with all due respect, but I think it's pretty clear you suffer from megalomania or are braindead.

You're making it look like @Replica GK Owner went out of his way to make a message which was/is hard to understand, however it isn't, it seems like @video clearly understands what Capri is saying in this matter, if you don't that's fine, but don't turn things around to gain an advantage where there is none to gain.

The quote on plagiarism was posted to show you're more than clearly not aware of what the word means, maybe use Google yourself next time, saves you the embarrassment of showing this whole community what a sad and most of all idiotic kid you really are.

 

I feel like you need to learn how to read:

But instead you waste my time and mods time to read more text, but sure I'll play your little game.

This image is not public, that's like saying the image of a brand like PieGP is public. I payed for my thread layout via a sythe designer, you here mentioned again that your guy used my design as a template.
I showed this to Jason before making the report because I already thought your guy just copied my image looking at the size of it, if you look at my total image size it's the exact same meaning my image is actually completely the source.

Again, I won the runegold case because it had to many similarities as mine and was nearly identical in most. Looking at the one your Btec designer made is again similar in most and the flow/design is copied without asking.

I first contacted you nicely saying you had 24 hours to remove the image before I post a ras on you but your peanut brain can't comprehend the usage of the ras forum so now you try to say I'm wasting time.

I tagged Video because he ruled out in the runegold report that it's not under graphics marketplace rules, but as I've seen before and "replica GK owner" has stated before: he sells graphics. Meaning that he does fall under these rules and if it rules out as plagiarism there are precautions such as market bans.

Now to end this you should really stop replying and wait for the mods response.
Calling me names that I'm not doesn't work out, the fact that I called you an idiot is just straight facts because you can see you went for a designer who had to take somebody else his design to adjust it and make it their own. The fact you called me braindead doesn't really work out and to and to tell you why I'm here with some more google skills:

Spoiler: google boi

Brain death is used as an indicator of legal death in many jurisdictions, but it is defined inconsistently and often confused by the lay public. Various parts of the brain may keep functioning when others do not anymore, and the term "brain death" has been used to refer to various combinations. For example, although one major medical dictionary considers "brain death" to be synonymous with "cerebral death" (death of the cerebrum), the US National Library of Medicine Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) system defines brain death as including the brainstem. The distinctions are medically significant because, for example, in someone with a dead cerebrum but a living brainstem, the heartbeat and ventilation can continue unaided, whereas in whole-brain death (which includes brainstem death), only life support equipment would keep those functions going.

 

You can't expect to make some "points" without an answer to them.

First off, let me rephrase that as I do not know whether he used your GFX work as a template, so for that reason I rephrase the sentence:

He didn't commit plagiarism he used a public image as a template

To:

He didn't commit plagiarism, he may have used a public image as a template.

Only thing I will reply to in your essay, as it's basically a 1:1 with your first text (plagiarism!!!!!!!!) is that you stated you asked nicely, you throwing a fuzz in the public lobby of the discord and saying "yo dude, you got 1 day to remove the thread design" isn't exactly "nicely".

 

Since you @Mots like to have everything in order I’ll do the same.


First of all: hydra bets didn’t pay me for their thread, in fact I do everything for free for hydra bets since I want to support a nice discord like that, either way I don’t think you understand the word “nice” but not gonna judge you on that.


Second: Plagiarism is something else then inspiration, plagiarism is someone making a design and someone else copying the same design and changing “a bit”.


Third: Like video mentioned in dm on discord already, the designs is different enough to not being plagiarism, in fact the only word which is the same is “games” but i think every gamble discord can mention “games” on there thread.


Last thing: our thread is way different they yours in fact like you mentioned, the size isn’t the same since we got a banner under it which means our is bigger and not the same!Everything else is just relateded to our discord, background, top, text and the games we offer!


I also want to mention the following: the way mots handled this was not professional at all! Coming in HB discord and saying “you get 24hours to remove the thread” instead first dming one of us. Also i think mots is complaining cause our thread is just more professional and he doesn’t want people te see ours se he gets more customers but sythe doesn’t care about that, sythe is a community which keeps people safe from scammers and lures! You say that haantje (jacco) a scammer is but in my opinion I call it lieing to give us a bad reputation which shouldnt be the point of a simple thread which basicly just explains everything we offer and if you’re jealous, thats your problem but not the mods or admins from sythe, they got more to do instead looking into this, also mots the way you say “i would appreciate if you dont send anymore till mod anwsers” isn’t professional, we all got the rights to express our opinions and facts!

 

The designs are different enough to not be classified as plagiarism. Also in reference to the Rune Gold report, we don't use that as a precedent because there wasn't actually a ruling on the thread made by staff, the situation was resolved between parties.