Need Testers For My New Bot's!

Testers Needed!

Hello Sythe users. I know I do not have any posts really, but that is because, you usually find me on Fagex.net ... There RuneScape forums are not as active as they are here, and I would like to have as many testers as possible, to find bugs / errors with my upcoming Bots/Macros.
What Am I Looking For?

Basically, I am looking for a semi-trusted user, that I could trust to not leak these programs, but run each of the Bot's for a while, finding anything they see that is not flawless. This way, when I make public and private releases, they will be perfect. Also, any GOOD testers will have full access to any private editions.

What Does This Include?

The Bots I am writing, are being written in VB6, along with some C++. They are ALL executable files, with easy-to-use GUI's. NO SCAR SCRIPTS.

What Will There Be To Test?

So far, I have completed almost 3 of the 8 programs I plan on doing. The Bot's finished are as follows:

-Auto-Fighter v.9 (Uses auto-set pixel detectors, along with freezers and partial Mopitcal take-overs, to make the mouse movements look as if they are being made by you)
-Any-Fletcher v.9 (I have implemented color schemes into the interface, for easy selection. Just choose what you want to fletch, using what logs. Have knife first in inventory. Stringer is underway.
-Any-FisherBanker v.9 (Catches any type of fish, select your options using the GUI. Then choose to bank or not, and select your area. It detects where you are on map from 6 locations)


If you are interested in being a tester, please post a reply, and also, send me a private message. I will speak with you, and determine if you are fit for the position needed. Thank you, and enjoy botting.

-Fagex​

 

How can we contact you

 

As I said, send me a private message, and then I will explain to you further contact sources. Thanks.

 

Hey I would like to be a poster I sent you a private message!

 

My "Private Message" section shows no messages.

 

Hey. Can I be tester? I sent you message.

 

I can understand why a developer would want a more active forum to broaden testing.

What I don't understand here is why you didn't even bother posting the same request on the Fagex forums.

The problem is that we get a lot of people driving through here claiming to have something cool that ends up being a keylogger or phisher.

I just made a thread on Fagex in Spam Central. I would appreciate it if you'd reply there with the name that you're well known by at Fagex. The answer is "Cynthia Davis".

Thanks in advance.

 

Alright well the autofighter works pretty well but theres a problem with the food function and it doesnt work please try and fix

 

One guy registers today and makes his first post asking for beta testers

Another guy registers today and makes his first post asking to be a tester and comes back in a half hour with a progress report.

Another guy makes his first post wanting to be a tester.

Fail.

 

NO THANKS
45 minutes later, no answer on Fagex.

This comes just a day after somebody was claiming to have a brand new bot system called SARS. The "bot" was a phisher which changed the Windows hosts file so that all connections to Runescape would go to the phisher site instead.

Why wasn't this posted over on Fagex? There must be a lot of people there who would know this person (if indeed he's known over there) and who would be more than happy to test the bots.

Then somebody made a brand new account just to test this and returns 25 minutes later----having been approved, setting up the program, testing it, and coming to a conclusion.

It may be legit, but it just doesn't add up for me. If you run these programs, and something bad happens, remember that you had plenty of clues that it might not be what it's claimed to be.

 

can i plz test for u i really need a new bot and love to find the errors in scripts

 

Should be locked/deleted? This is a potential risk to users as he wants testers to run his executables... highly suspect.

 

I pm'd....got three programs....none of them work "failed to init".