monsters exist?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/new...tery-animal-corpse-becomes-web-sensation.html


saw it on the news and was like... what the fucking shit.....


discuss

 

That picture is probably bullshit like a costume or something....
Don"t trust stupid stuff on the internet...-.-

 

NO! That was on the actual news, not on the internet. It washed ashore a couple days ago, they thought it was a decomposing raccoon or something. l0l.

 

Have you ever thought that there are animals yet to be discovered? There is no such things as "monsters", only scary, unknown animals.

 

Monster = Unkown Lifeform.

Just undiscovered, could be new species, could be a hoax.

 

its real. was on the news and my aunt lives near the beach

 

It could be some unknown life form, but if looks like a deformed dog.

 

Lul, there was a case back about 50-100 years ago, where a professional taxedermist took several parts of animals, put em together and it was deemed a beast. This is probably one of those.

 

Just because it was on the news doesn't necessarily mean its real. Did your aunt ever see it?

I think its a hoax. Notice how the carcas mysteriously disappeared after some supposed old geezer carted it away to mount it on his wall?

Also, there's a few more pictures of it here.

 

I live on long island...like 45 mins away from where that was =)...I don't think its real to tell you the truth. It appears they take a picture and they leave n come back and its gone?

Edit: It could be real. Im not sure what to believe, in the pictures one side is red. Which could mean blood pooling. That happens when something dies and is left on one side, and the other side is a pale white. Kinda leads me to believe it could be real

 

No.... the lifeguard said the body decomposed, they have the bones and skull and decomposing body in a bag which they sent to scientist. Overall I think the whole thing is a hoax just like that dragon one. You can read about it here:

http://www.rense.com/general50/hoax.htm

pretty much these scientist made a super realistic baby dragon and preserved it in a jar claiming that they found it. So many people thought it was real until it was disproved after modern scientist ran tests on it.

 

Theres been heaps of hoaxes, where people even rearange bones to look like angles and burry them, then someone digs it up and like omfg haxorz. then the realise these bones are from like 5 different animals lol.

Dont believe this shit, theyl make these headlines and whatever for ratings.

 

its all a buch of bull

 

i think thats bs

 

It looks exactly like a dog, but idk, might be a hoax.

 

It decomposed from a full corpse to bones in just 2 weeks?

 

It just looks like a slightly deformed pig.

 

It could be any number of hoaxes, but if I'd say it might be real. Unfortunately, your title thread lead me to believe there was some Human-Like lifeform that was a typical looking "Monster" and it had finally been discovered. How beast would that be?

 

If that news is true, I'm going to have to agree with this, it would be hard to find a new creature/animal these days, but it can happen.

 

why do ppl instantly have to name anything they can't identify as a "monster", that just goes to show the lvl of paranoia in the world today. From the teeth it is obviously a carnivor. Be the girth of the hips id say it was possibly capable of bi-pedal movements. This animal should have been taken immediatly to a research center to be identifed AND checked for cause of death. The creature being bound shows that it was drowned on purpose. So someone out there knows exactly what it was/ is. Most likely it is an animal that we are familiar with, not setting aside the idea it could be a mutation, tho unlikely. It is however most definatly a homicide victim and sould be investigated by authorities. The are penalties for cruelty to animals and i'm sure this qualifies.

I can't even believe the second picutre is real and here's why ... 1) the body is blue and not the red as shown in the first pic, which is logical from being in the sun. 2) the second picture A. has ears B. has no "fur" and the 'face' seems to be in a greater decomposition. c. They claim the surf was moving the body around yet the sand shows no indicators of being wet.

As much as I hate to say it, since I am STRONGLY opposed to Jeff Corwin, he may be right. It is probably a mammal, less likely a rodent.

The fact that the front 'paws' are bound significently decreasess the probability that it's a turtle.

One of the theories suggests that it may have come from that animal research center, if that is true and it was drowned on purpose, if I were the people that have that corpse i'd seriously be worried about WHY they drowned it and the possible risks to myself and others leaving a possibly infected carcass laying around on my property.

- Originally posted by "sha" of Telegraph.co.uk[/quote]