Adblock breaks this site

I did not call someone a scammer without proof.

Discussion in 'Report A Scammer Archive' started by I Want Milz, May 10, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Thread Tools

Thread Tools

  • Thread ID:
  1. I Want Milz

    I Want Milz Forum Addict
    Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Posts:
    327
    Referrals:
    3
    Sythe Gold:
    0
    I did not call someone a scammer without proof.
    Perhaps you guy's should have read the report a scammer area first. http://www.sythe.org/showthread.php?t=402553 Clear proof that Radiophonic is a SCAMMER, and I got an unfair infraction, even though I gave evidence I think is conclusive enough to prove him to be a scammer. Even if in your opinion you think its not enough, I still think an infraction is too harsh. Please consider this, thank you.
     
    I Want Milz, May 10, 2008
    #1
  2. Eric

    Eric Grand Master
    Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2007
    Posts:
    3,344
    Referrals:
    13
    Sythe Gold:
    25
    I did not call someone a scammer without proof.
    In the thread, you called him a scammer, without proof.
     
    Eric, May 10, 2008
    #2
  3. I Want Milz

    I Want Milz Forum Addict
    Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Posts:
    327
    Referrals:
    3
    Sythe Gold:
    0
    I did not call someone a scammer without proof.
    Your supposed to post the proof in every thread you accuse someone of it? I thought that's what the report a scammer sectionwas for. Can you atleast look at it please?
     
    I Want Milz, May 10, 2008
    #3
  4. Zypur

    Zypur Guest

    Referrals:
    0
    I did not call someone a scammer without proof.
    Yes, read the rules.

    The infraction will remain.
     
    Zypur, May 11, 2008
    #4
< Owned_pls Is a scammer | crysis is a scammer scammed me my str pure. >
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.


 
 
Adblock breaks this site