I did not call someone a scammer without proof.

Discussion in 'Report A Scammer Archive' started by I Want Milz, May 10, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
I did not call someone a scammer without proof.
  1. Unread #1 - May 10, 2008 at 10:39 PM
  2. I Want Milz
    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Posts:
    327
    Referrals:
    3
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    I Want Milz Forum Addict
    Banned

    I did not call someone a scammer without proof.

    Perhaps you guy's should have read the report a scammer area first. http://www.sythe.org/showthread.php?t=402553 Clear proof that Radiophonic is a SCAMMER, and I got an unfair infraction, even though I gave evidence I think is conclusive enough to prove him to be a scammer. Even if in your opinion you think its not enough, I still think an infraction is too harsh. Please consider this, thank you.
     
  3. Unread #2 - May 10, 2008 at 11:30 PM
  4. Eric
    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2007
    Posts:
    3,344
    Referrals:
    13
    Sythe Gold:
    25

    Eric Grand Master
    Banned

    I did not call someone a scammer without proof.

    In the thread, you called him a scammer, without proof.
     
  5. Unread #3 - May 10, 2008 at 11:43 PM
  6. I Want Milz
    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Posts:
    327
    Referrals:
    3
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    I Want Milz Forum Addict
    Banned

    I did not call someone a scammer without proof.

    Your supposed to post the proof in every thread you accuse someone of it? I thought that's what the report a scammer sectionwas for. Can you atleast look at it please?
     
  7. Unread #4 - May 11, 2008 at 5:42 PM
  8. Zypur
    Referrals:
    0

    Zypur Guest

    I did not call someone a scammer without proof.

    Yes, read the rules.

    The infraction will remain.
     
< Owned_pls Is a scammer | crysis is a scammer scammed me my str pure. >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.


 
 
Adblock breaks this site